How were indentured servants different from slaves? (1 point) Responses Slaves were paid a small wage and indentured servants were forced to work for no money. Slaves were paid a small wage and indentured servants were forced to work for no money. Indentured servants agreed to work for no money in exchange for land and tools after a certain period of time, while slaves were forced to work indefinitely. Indentured servants agreed to work for no money in exchange for land and tools after a certain period of time, while slaves were forced to work indefinitely. Indentured servants worked indefinitely and slaves agreed to work for five years in exchange for freedom at the end of the five years. Indentured servants worked indefinitely and slaves agreed to work for five years in exchange for freedom at the end of the five years. Indentured servants earned wages but slaves did not.
Indentured servants agreed to work for no money in exchange for land and tools after a certain period of time, while slaves were forced to work indefinitely.
Indentured servants agreed to work for no money in exchange for land and tools after a certain period of time, while slaves were forced to work indefinitely.
The correct response is: Indentured servants agreed to work for no money in exchange for land and tools after a certain period of time, while slaves were forced to work indefinitely.
To understand the difference between indentured servants and slaves, one should examine the historical context of colonial America.
Indentured servants were individuals who willingly entered into a contract, known as an indenture, with a colonial employer or master. In exchange for their labor, indentured servants would receive passage to the colonies, room, board, and the promise of land and tools after a specified period of service, usually ranging from four to seven years. During their term of service, they did not receive wages but instead worked under a contractual arrangement.
On the other hand, slaves were forcibly captured, sold, or born into slavery. They were considered property and were owned by their masters without any choice or option to negotiate their terms of service. Slavery was a lifelong condition, with slaves being regarded as legal possessions rather than individuals with rights. Slaves were subject to harsh treatment, forced labor, and were considered the property of their owners with no opportunity for freedom or land ownership.
To summarize, the fundamental difference between indentured servants and slaves lies in their legal status, contractual agreement, and the prospect of eventual freedom and land ownership for indentured servants compared to the permanence and lack of choice inherent in slavery.