Beginning in 1881, the practice of spoils system was still widespread, and James Garfield's brief tenure as president was dominated by disputes over the selection of cabinet members. After President James Garfield's murder, the spoils system's failure resulted in fatal repercussions. Chester Arthur, Garfield's successor, tried to abolish the spoils system despite being a product of it.
How did the spoils system affect American politics?
From the 1820s until after the Civil War, the spoils system in the United States thrived unchecked. However, the abuses of the system led to civil service reforms that aimed to reduce the number of government positions filled by appointment and to award jobs on the basis of merit. President Andrew Jackson's supporters promoted the spoils system on the basis of pragmatic political considerations, seeing it as a way to reward party members and fortify the party structure.
Answer rating3.6
(14 votes)
AnswersAndHelpMe avatar
That thanks ment Thanks alot in sarcasim btw
AnswersAndHelpMe avatar
I feel like all the spammers include "To learn more about this question, visit this link."
Advertisement
brainly plus
Get your grade upgrade
Get unlimited, ad-free access to Brainly community help, expert textbook explanations, and step-by-step math solutions.
Answer
author link
AnswersAndHelpMe
Ambitious
11 answers
552 people helped
Answer:
(Re-write the paragraph!)
In 1881, the practice of the spoiles system was still happening, and James Garfield's was dominated by disputes over the selection of cabinet members. after Garfield's murder, Chester arthur tried to abolish the spoiles system despite being a product of it.
Explanation:
I made this because i feel like all the expert verified answers might be spammed, and that include to learn more, click this link to another brainly question.
Explore all similar answers
rating answer section
Answer rating4.2
(10 votes)
Schoolanswers12 avatar
Error Free ✅
Advertisement
Survey
Did this page answer your question?
Still have questions?
brainly plus
Get your grade upgrade
Get unlimited, ad-free access to Brainly community help, expert textbook explanations, and step-by-step math solutions.
Help others with History questions
1 minute ago
HELPPPPP HELPPPP WITH CIVICS PLEASEEE What could I say to answer question 5?
+5
1 minute ago
First question
How did the Spanish colonization effort differ from those of the French and Dutch?
+5
3 minutes ago
19. Before he became Vice President and then President of the United States, Lyndon Johnson had exercised great power as a. Secretary of Defense. b. Majority Leader of the U.S. Senate. c. a wealthy Texas businessman. d. governor of Texas. e. Speaker of the House of Representatives.
+10
3 minutes ago
After Jesus crossed the Sea of Galilee, a great multitude followed Him, because they saw the signs that He performed on those who were diseased. John records that Jesus fed this great multitude- How many men does John record in chapter 6 eat while seated on the mountain with Jesus?
+10
3 minutes ago
Which of the following does not reflect one of the historic characteristics that make up Texas political culture? a. provincialism b. preference for limited government c. the strong role of labor unions d. the dominance of the Democratic Party
The spoils system had a significant impact on American politics. It was a system where government positions were filled based on political loyalty rather than qualifications or merit. This resulted in numerous negative consequences:
1. Corruption: The spoils system led to widespread corruption as political supporters were rewarded with government jobs, contracts, and favors. This undermined the integrity of the government and weakened public trust.
2. Inefficiency: Many government positions were filled by unqualified individuals who lacked the necessary skills or knowledge. This resulted in ineffective governance and hindered the ability of the government to effectively address important issues.
3. Lack of accountability: The spoils system created a situation where government officials were more loyal to their political party than to the public. This led to a lack of accountability as officials prioritized party interests over the needs and concerns of the citizens.
4. Partisanship: The spoils system reinforced political partisanship as government positions became a means to reward and strengthen party loyalty. This further polarized the political landscape and hindered cooperation and compromise.
5. Limited diversity: The spoils system favored individuals who were politically connected, often excluding women, minorities, and individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds from government positions. This resulted in a lack of diversity and representation within the government.
Overall, the spoils system had a detrimental impact on American politics, leading to corruption, inefficiency, lack of accountability, increased partisanship, and limited diversity. The negative consequences of the spoils system ultimately led to the push for civil service reforms and the establishment of merit-based hiring practices.
The spoils system, which was widespread in American politics from the 1820s until after the Civil War, had a significant impact on the political landscape. The spoils system involved appointing individuals to government positions based on their loyalty and support to a political party, rather than their qualifications or merit.
The spoils system affected American politics in several ways:
1. Party Loyalty: The spoils system reinforced and rewarded party loyalty. It encouraged individuals to support a political party in order to secure government positions and benefits.
2. Corruption: The spoils system led to rampant corruption. Government officials were often appointed based on their political connections rather than their ability to perform the job effectively. This resulted in officials using their positions for personal gain, promoting nepotism, and engaging in bribery and kickbacks.
3. Inefficiency and Incompetence: Under the spoils system, many government officials lacked the necessary skills or experience for the positions they held. This resulted in inefficient and incompetent governance and hindered the effective functioning of government agencies.
4. Lack of accountability: The spoils system hindered accountability in government. Since officials were appointed based on their political connections rather than their qualifications, there was less incentive for them to perform well or be held accountable for their actions.
5. Party Patronage: The spoils system reinforced the power of political parties. It allowed parties to control the distribution of government positions and resources, giving them more influence and control over the political system.
6. Civil Service Reforms: The abuses of the spoils system eventually led to calls for civil service reforms. These reforms aimed to reduce political patronage and replace the spoils system with a system based on merit and qualifications. The Pendleton Civil Service Act of 1883 was one such reform that established a merit-based system for federal employment.
In summary, the spoils system had a detrimental effect on American politics. It promoted corruption, inefficiency, and party patronage, while hindering accountability and preventing the appointment of qualified individuals to government positions. The abuses of the spoils system ultimately led to reforms aimed at reducing political patronage and establishing a more merit-based system.
The spoils system, also known as the patronage system, had a significant impact on American politics. It allowed elected officials to fill government positions with their loyal supporters and party members, often in exchange for political favors or support. This system was prevalent in the United States from the 1820s until the Civil War.
Under the spoils system, jobs in the government were not awarded based on merit or qualifications but rather on political loyalty and affiliation. This led to rampant corruption and inefficiency in the civil service. Officials would appoint their friends and supporters to positions they were not qualified for, leading to incompetence and a lack of effectiveness in government.
The spoils system had negative consequences for both the government and the public. It undermined the integrity of the civil service by prioritizing political connections over competence. It also created a culture of favoritism and cronyism, where government officials used their power to reward their supporters, leading to a perception of corruption and unfairness.
The abuses of the spoils system eventually led to calls for reform. In the late 19th century, civil service reforms were enacted to reduce the number of government positions filled by appointment and to establish a merit-based system of hiring. The Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act of 1883 was a significant step in this direction, establishing a civil service commission to oversee appointments based on merit and qualifications.
The spoils system, while once widespread, began to decline with these reforms. Today, the United States has a civil service system that emphasizes merit-based hiring and promotion, aiming to ensure that government positions are filled by competent individuals rather than political appointees.