Apache and Comanche camped near which landforms to provide protection from attacks?(1 point)
Responses
lakes and forest
plains and rivers
canyons and mountains
coast and bayous
canyons and mountains
The Apache and Comanche tribes camped near canyons and mountains to provide protection from attacks.
To determine which landforms Apache and Comanche camped near to provide protection from attacks, we can analyze the characteristics and strategic advantages of each option.
1. Lakes and Forest: While lakes and forests may offer some concealment, they do not necessarily provide substantial protection from attacks. The terrain in these areas is generally less rugged and easily accessible.
2. Plains and Rivers: Plains and rivers can be advantageous for hunting and access to water, but they do not provide much natural protection from attacks. The flat landscape of plains and the open channels of rivers can leave a camp vulnerable.
3. Canyons and Mountains: Canyons and mountains are natural fortifications that can offer significant protection from attacks. Their rugged terrain can serve as a deterrent and make it difficult for invaders to navigate or launch direct assaults.
4. Coast and Bayous: Coastal areas and bayous typically provide fewer defensive advantages compared to canyons and mountains. While they may offer some natural obstacles like water obstacles or marshy terrain, they are generally more exposed and easier to approach.
Given this analysis, the most likely answer is that Apache and Comanche camped near canyons and mountains to provide protection from attacks. These landforms would have offered strategic advantages and natural barriers to defend against potential threats.