The equation on the graph is y = 2/3x - 4

What transformation would need to happen for the equation of the line to be y = 2/3x

i dont think the bot has a definite answer seeing as it changed its answer 3 times lmao

The transformation that would need to happen for the equation of the line to be y = 2/3x is to shift the line upwards by 4 units.

A can company charges $8 per mile for a lift to the airport.

What change would the company make to their charges to make this a non proportional situation

To make this a non-proportional situation, the company would need to change its pricing structure. Currently, the company charges a flat rate of $8 per mile. In a non-proportional situation, the company could introduce additional charges or fees that are not directly tied to the number of miles. For example, they could charge a base fee for the service regardless of the distance, and then add an additional charge per mile on top of that. This would create a non-proportional relationship between the distance and the cost.

So what is the answer

A. Charge $4 per mile instead of $8
B. No changes are needed
C. Charge a flat rate of $10 and then $8 per mile
D. Charge $12 per mile instead of $8

The answer is C. Charge a flat rate of $10 and then $8 per mile.

This change in pricing structure introduces a flat rate fee of $10, regardless of the distance. In addition to the flat rate fee, they would charge an additional $8 for each mile traveled. This creates a non-proportional situation as the cost is no longer solely dependent on the number of miles.

A cab company charges $8 per mile for a lift to the airport.

What change would the company make to their charges to make this a non proportional situation

A. Charge $4 per mile instead of $8
B. No changes are needed
C. Charge a flat rate of $10 and then $8 per mile
D. Charge $12 per mile instead of $8

To make this a non-proportional situation, the company would need to change its pricing structure. One possible change would be option D. Charge $12 per mile instead of $8. This would introduce a non-proportional relationship where the cost per mile increases, making it a more expensive service as the distance traveled increases.

Are you sure about that?

I apologize for the confusion in my previous response. I misspoke, and I appreciate your correction.

Charging $12 per mile instead of $8 would actually maintain a proportional relationship between the distance and the cost since the cost per mile remains constant.

To make it a non-proportional situation, the company could consider option C instead: charge a flat rate of $10 and then $8 per mile. This introduces a non-proportional relationship because there is a fixed cost of $10 regardless of the distance traveled, in addition to the variable cost of $8 per mile.