Which statement correctly compares differences between Ethiopia's and Siam's resistance to imperialism? (1 point)
• Ethiopia was forced to resort to violent resistance to maintain independence, while Siam used diplomacy.
• Ethiopia signed treaties with neighboring colonies to resist imperialism, but Siam used military force to deter invasion
Ethiopia was threatened with imperialism from France, while Siam was threatened by imperialism from Italy.
• Siam emphasized its religious connections to resist imperialism, but Ethiopia emphasized economic connections.
The statement that correctly compares differences between Ethiopia's and Siam's resistance to imperialism is:
Ethiopia was forced to resort to violent resistance to maintain independence, while Siam used diplomacy.
The statement that correctly compares the differences between Ethiopia's and Siam's resistance to imperialism is:
Ethiopia was forced to resort to violent resistance to maintain independence, while Siam used diplomacy.
The correct statement that compares the differences between Ethiopia's and Siam's resistance to imperialism is:
• Ethiopia was forced to resort to violent resistance to maintain independence, while Siam used diplomacy.
To arrive at this answer, we need to analyze the given options and assess their accuracy.
Option 1 states that Ethiopia resorted to violent resistance while Siam used diplomacy. To confirm its accuracy, we can look for historical records or sources that describe Ethiopia's resistance to imperialism, such as the Italo-Ethiopian War. This conflict involved armed resistance by Ethiopia against Italian imperialism in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. On the other hand, Siam, which is modern-day Thailand, managed to maintain its independence by skillfully navigating through diplomatic negotiations with Western powers, such as signing treaties and entering into diplomatic agreements. This highlights the accuracy of option 1.
Option 2 states that Ethiopia signed treaties with neighboring colonies to resist imperialism, while Siam used military force to deter invasion. However, this statement is not accurate. Ethiopia did not primarily rely on treaties with neighboring colonies to resist imperialism. Instead, it engaged in direct military conflicts to defend its independence, as mentioned earlier. Conversely, Siam's resistance to imperialism was more focused on diplomatic efforts rather than military force.
Option 3 states that Ethiopia was threatened with imperialism from France, while Siam was threatened by imperialism from Italy. However, this statement is not accurate either. Ethiopia's main threat of imperialism came from Italy, not France. The historical conflict between Ethiopia and Italy, ending with Ethiopia's victory, is a well-documented example of this. Additionally, there is no evidence to suggest that Siam was threatened by imperialism from Italy.
Option 4 states that Siam emphasized its religious connections to resist imperialism, while Ethiopia emphasized economic connections. This statement is incorrect. While religious and economic factors may have played a role in the resistance of both nations, it is not accurate to specifically attribute religious emphasis to Siam and economic emphasis to Ethiopia.
Based on the above evaluations, it is clear that option 1 is the correct statement that accurately compares the differences between Ethiopia's and Siam's resistance to imperialism.