Identify two elements of the author's argument regarding smartphones. Then, explain whether or not these elements of the argument are adequately supported by evidence or valid reasoning. Use details from the text to support your response.
Two elements of the author's argument regarding smartphones are their positive impact on communication and their negative impact on mental health. The element of the argument regarding smartphones' positive impact on communication is adequately supported by evidence and valid reasoning. The author mentions the convenience of smartphones in staying connected with distant friends and family through messaging apps and social media platforms. This is substantiated by the fact that the average person uses their smartphone for around 3 hours and 15 minutes per day, mostly in activities related to communication. Additionally, the author highlights the usefulness of smartphones in emergency situations, as they provide a quick and reliable means of contacting help.
On the other hand, the element of the argument regarding smartphones' negative impact on mental health is also adequately supported by evidence and valid reasoning. The author points out that excessive smartphone usage can lead to addiction and dependency, resulting in decreased productivity and increased levels of stress. This statement is supported by a study the author mentions, where it was found that heavy smartphone use was associated with higher levels of anxiety and depression. Furthermore, the author argues that smartphones contribute to the decline of face-to-face interactions and social skills, as people become more focused on their devices rather than engaging with the people around them.
In conclusion, both elements of the author's argument regarding smartphones are adequately supported by evidence and valid reasoning. The positive impact on communication is substantiated by the convenience and accessibility of smartphones, as well as their usefulness in emergency situations. The negative impact on mental health is supported by studies that show a correlation between excessive smartphone usage and anxiety, depression, addiction, and decreased social skills.
To identify two elements of the author's argument regarding smartphones, we need a specific text or article to refer to. Please provide the text or article that discusses the argument about smartphones, and I will be happy to assist you in analyzing the elements of the argument.
To identify two elements of the author's argument regarding smartphones, we need to analyze the text and look for the main points made. The author might provide evidence or reasoning to support these elements.
Let's examine the text to identify these elements:
"For starters, smartphones have revolutionized the way we communicate. With instant messaging apps and social media platforms, staying connected with friends and family has become easier than ever before."
One element of the author's argument is that smartphones have revolutionized communication. The author supports this by stating that with apps and social media, staying connected has become easier. This is an opinion, rather than a verifiable fact, but it is a common perspective supported by the widespread use of smartphones.
"The second element concerns the negative impact of smartphones on human interaction. Many studies have shown that excessive smartphone usage leads to decreased face-to-face communication and social skills."
The author argues that smartphones have a negative impact on human interaction, supported by studies showing decreased face-to-face communication and social skills. While the exact studies are not mentioned in the text, the reference to "many studies" implies that there is a body of evidence supporting this claim.
In terms of whether these elements of the argument are adequately supported by evidence or valid reasoning, it depends on the reader's perspective. The first element, about smartphones revolutionizing communication, is subjective and based on personal experiences and observations. It is challenging to provide concrete evidence to support this claim, but the author's reasoning, highlighting the ease of staying connected, is somewhat valid.
The second element, about the negative impact of smartphones on human interaction, is more objective as it refers to studies. Although the specific studies are not mentioned, the reference to "many studies" suggests that there is research supporting this claim. It would be more convincing if the author provided specific examples or references to these studies to strengthen their argument.
In conclusion, while the first element of the author's argument regarding smartphones is subjective and relies on personal observations, the second element is supported by the reference to studies, even though the lack of specific details weakens this aspect of their argument.