Source 1: photograph

Source2: Text

Source 2 can be regarded as a more scholarly text than Source 2 because? :  

The author’s full details are provided and she is affiliated with a university.

It is a research article that was published in an accredited scholarly journal.   

The article was peer-reviewed.   

The language of the article is formal and academic. 

All of the above.   

There are no colour photographs included, unlike Source 2.

The correct answer is: All of the above. Source 2 can be regarded as a more scholarly text than Source 2 because the author's full details are provided and she is affiliated with a university, it is a research article that was published in an accredited scholarly journal, the article was peer-reviewed, and the language of the article is formal and academic. The absence of color photographs in Source 2 does not necessarily indicate its scholarly nature.

The correct answer is: All of the above.

Explanation:
To determine if Source 2 can be regarded as a more scholarly text than Source 1, we need to consider several factors.

1. The author's full details are provided and she is affiliated with a university: This indicates that the author has academic credentials and is associated with an institution known for research and scholarly work, which adds credibility to the text.

2. It is a research article published in an accredited scholarly journal: Research articles published in accredited scholarly journals undergo a rigorous review process to ensure the quality and validity of the research. This indicates that the research and findings in Source 2 have been reviewed and evaluated by experts in the field.

3. The article was peer-reviewed: Peer review is an important aspect of scholarly publishing. It involves evaluation of the article by experts in the same field as the author to ensure its quality and accuracy. The fact that Source 2 has undergone the peer review process further supports its scholarly nature.

4. The language of the article is formal and academic: Scholarly texts often use formal and academic language to convey complex ideas and research findings accurately. If Source 2 uses such language, it suggests that it is targeting an audience knowledgeable in the subject matter and adheres to scholarly standards.

5. There are no color photographs included, unlike Source 1: Scholarly texts primarily rely on written content rather than visual elements. The absence of color photographs in Source 2 aligns with the traditional format of scholarly texts.

Considering all these factors, the correct answer is "All of the above" because all of the provided options support the claim that Source 2 can be regarded as a more scholarly text than Source 1.

To determine if Source 2 can be regarded as a more scholarly text than Source 1, we need to evaluate several factors:

1. Author details and affiliation: Check if the author's full details are provided and whether they are affiliated with a university or educational institution. This information indicates the author's expertise and credibility.

2. Publication in a scholarly journal: Determine if Source 2 is a research article published in an accredited scholarly journal. Scholarly journals are known for maintaining high academic standards, and publishing in such journals indicates the rigor and quality of the content.

3. Peer review: Check if the article underwent a peer-review process. Peer review involves experts in the field reviewing the article for accuracy, methodology, and validity. It is a standard process to ensure the quality and reliability of scholarly articles.

4. Language and style: Analyze the language and style used in Source 2. Scholarly texts usually employ formal and academic language, avoiding slang or colloquialisms. This demonstrates the author's adherence to accepted academic conventions.

Considering these factors, if Source 2 meets any of the following criteria, it can be regarded as a more scholarly text:

- The author's full details are provided, and they are affiliated with a university.
- It is a research article published in an accredited scholarly journal.
- The article underwent a peer-review process.
- The language used in the article is formal and academic.

Therefore, the correct answer would be "All of the above."