Source 1: photograph
Source2: Text
Source 2 can be regarded as a more scholarly text than Source 2 because:
The author’s full details are provided and she is affiliated with a university.
It is a research article that was published in an accredited scholarly journal.
The article was peer-reviewed.
The language of the article is formal and academic.
All of the above.
There are no colour photographs included, unlike Source 2.
The correct answer is: All of the above.
The correct answer is: All of the above.
To determine which source can be regarded as a more scholarly text, we need to evaluate the characteristics of both sources.
Based on the given information, we can analyze the options one by one:
1. The author's full details are provided and she is affiliated with a university.
This suggests that the author has academic credentials and is associated with an educational institution, which is often an indicator of a scholarly source.
2. It is a research article that was published in an accredited scholarly journal.
Being published in an accredited scholarly journal indicates that the article has undergone a rigorous review process and has met certain academic standards. This is another characteristic of a scholarly source.
3. The article was peer-reviewed.
Peer review is a process in which experts in the field evaluate the quality and validity of a research article before it is published. It ensures that the research is reliable and credible, further suggesting that the source is scholarly in nature.
4. The language of the article is formal and academic.
Scholarly sources typically use formal and academic language, as they are intended for an audience of researchers, academics, and professionals in the specific field.
Considering the above points, the correct answer is: All of the above.
The fact that Source 2 does not include color photographs, unlike Source 1, is not directly related to whether it is a more scholarly text. While the absence of color photographs might be a characteristic of some scholarly sources, it is not a definitive indicator on its own.