What did you observe?(1 point)%0D%0AResponses%0D%0A%0D%0AStarch was denatured%0D%0AStarch was denatured%0D%0A%0D%0AStarch was not broken down by the maltose enzyme%0D%0AStarch was not broken down by the maltose enzyme%0D%0A%0D%0AGlucose was present%0D%0AGlucose was present%0D%0A%0D%0AStarch was broken down by the maltose enzyme
Based on the given responses, the following observations can be made:
1. Starch was denatured.
2. Starch was not broken down by the maltose enzyme.
3. Glucose was present.
4. Starch was broken down by the maltose enzyme.
Based on the provided information, the following observations can be made:
1. Starch was denatured.
2. Starch was not broken down by the maltose enzyme.
3. Glucose was present.
4. Starch was broken down by the maltose enzyme.
Based on the given responses, the following observations can be made:
1. Starch was denatured: Denaturation refers to the structural change of a molecule, usually due to factors like temperature or pH. In this case, it suggests that the starch molecule underwent a change in its structure.
2. Starch was not broken down by the maltose enzyme: This indicates that the maltose enzyme was unable to break down the starch molecule into simpler components.
3. Glucose was present: The presence of glucose suggests that some form of starch breakdown occurred, potentially by another enzyme or process that converted starch into glucose.
4. Starch was broken down by the maltose enzyme: This observation contradicts the previous one and implies that the maltose enzyme was indeed able to break down starch into simpler components, such as glucose.