Which statement accurately contrasts the concepts of loose construction and strict construction?(1 point)

Responses

Loose construction is a broad interpretation of the Constitution, whereas strict construction interprets the Constitution exactly as it is written.
Loose construction is a broad interpretation of the Constitution, whereas strict construction interprets the Constitution exactly as it is written.

Loose construction allows for limited federal power, whereas strict construction allows for more federal power.
Loose construction allows for limited federal power, whereas strict construction allows for more federal power.

Loose construction interprets the Constitution as the original intent of its authors, whereas strict construction allows for interpretations to reflect modern-day issues.
Loose construction interprets the Constitution as the original intent of its authors, whereas strict construction allows for interpretations to reflect modern-day issues.

Loose construction was favored by the Anti-Federalists and strict construction was favored by the Federalists.

Loose construction is a broad interpretation of the Constitution, whereas strict construction interprets the Constitution exactly as it is written.

Option 2: Loose construction is a broad interpretation of the Constitution, whereas strict construction interprets the Constitution exactly as it is written.

The correct statement that accurately contrasts the concepts of loose construction and strict construction is:

"Loose construction is a broad interpretation of the Constitution, whereas strict construction interprets the Constitution exactly as it is written."

To determine the answer, we need to understand the definitions of loose construction and strict construction.

Loose construction, also known as broad construction or judicial activism, refers to a flexible interpretation of the Constitution. It allows for the expansion of federal powers beyond what is explicitly stated in the Constitution. Supporters of loose construction argue that the Constitution is a living document that should adapt to the changing needs of society.

On the other hand, strict construction, also known as originalism or textualism, involves interpreting the Constitution according to its literal and original meaning. Strict constructionists believe that the Constitution should be applied exactly as it was intended by the founders, without any deviation or expansion of its powers. They argue that any changes to the Constitution should be made through the amendment process.

Given these definitions, the statement "Loose construction is a broad interpretation of the Constitution, whereas strict construction interprets the Constitution exactly as it is written" accurately contrasts the concepts of loose construction and strict construction.