What made the American Federation of Labor (AFL) different from the Knights of Labor (KOL)?(1 point)
Responses
The AFL did not worry about its public image as much the Knights of Labor did and was more open to radical movements.
The AFL did not worry about its public image as much the Knights of Labor did and was more open to radical movements.
The AFL only accepted skilled workers, while the KOL represented both skilled and unskilled laborers.
The AFL only accepted skilled workers, while the KOL represented both skilled and unskilled laborers.
The AFL was more radical in its call for socialism while the Knights of Labor still supported capitalism.
The AFL was more radical in its call for socialism while the Knights of Labor still supported capitalism.
The KOL did not hold strikes while the AFL used them frequently to promote change.
The AFL only accepted skilled workers, while the KOL represented both skilled and unskilled laborers.
The correct answer is: The AFL only accepted skilled workers, while the KOL represented both skilled and unskilled laborers.
The correct response is: The AFL only accepted skilled workers, while the KOL represented both skilled and unskilled laborers.
To understand the difference between the American Federation of Labor (AFL) and the Knights of Labor (KOL), we need to examine their membership criteria. The AFL only accepted skilled workers, meaning individuals who possessed specialized skills or expertise in a particular field or trade. On the other hand, the KOL had a broader membership base that included both skilled and unskilled laborers.
By accepting only skilled workers, the AFL aimed to emphasize the importance of specialized skills and promote the interests of these workers. This approach allowed the AFL to focus on specific trade issues and negotiate with employers to secure better working conditions, wages, and benefits for skilled workers.
In contrast, the KOL believed in the unity of all laborers, regardless of their skill level. They sought to build a broad-based labor movement that could represent the collective interests of all workers, including both skilled and unskilled individuals.
By accepting members from various skill levels, the KOL aimed to create solidarity among workers and address wider social and economic issues affecting the working class as a whole. This approach often involved advocating for various labor reforms, such as the eight-hour workday and improved workplace safety.
Therefore, the key difference between the AFL and the KOL lies in their approach to membership. The AFL focused primarily on skilled workers, while the KOL represented both skilled and unskilled laborers.