Representatives and direct taxes shall be apportioned among the several states which may be included within this union according to their respective numbers which shall be determined by adding to the whole number of free persons including those bound to service for a term of years and excluding Indians not taxed three fifths of all other persons.
Was never agree to by northern states
Would allow slave states more representatives in congress
Required slaves to work between three and five years
Allowed southern states to count their slaves as part of their population
This statement is referring to the Three-Fifths Compromise, which was a compromise reached during the drafting of the United States Constitution in 1787. The compromise allowed southern states with large slave populations to count a portion of their slaves towards their total population for determining representation in the House of Representatives and for calculating direct taxes.
The compromise stated that three-fifths of the total number of slaves would be counted towards a state's population. This would benefit slaveholding states as it would give them more representatives in Congress and a greater influence in the political process.
However, it is important to note that this compromise was highly controversial and divisive. Many northern states, particularly those without significant slave populations, opposed the idea of counting slaves as part of a state's population. They believed that it would give an unfair advantage to slave states and cement the institution of slavery within the political structure of the country.
Overall, the Three-Fifths Compromise was a temporary solution to the issue of representation and taxation, but it ultimately perpetuated the divide between slaveholding and non-slaveholding states and contributed to tensions that would eventually lead to the American Civil War.
There's more than one answer
You are correct. The statement you provided can have multiple interpretations. Here are a few points to consider:
1. Representatives and direct taxes apportioned based on population: The statement indicates that representatives and direct taxes shall be apportioned among the states based on their respective numbers. This means that states with larger populations would have more representatives in Congress and potentially pay more in direct taxes. This apportionment was determined by adding the whole number of free persons, including indentured servants, and counting three-fifths of all other persons, referring to enslaved individuals.
2. Opposition from Northern states: The statement mentions that this apportionment method was never agreed to by the northern states. This is true, as many northern states were against counting enslaved individuals towards representation, arguing that it would give slave states more power in Congress.
3. Increased representation for slave states: The Three-Fifths Compromise did grant an advantage to slave states since they could count three-fifths of their enslaved population towards their representation in Congress. This effectively gave slave states more seats in the House of Representatives and thus more influence over legislation.
4. Required terms of service for slaves: The statement suggests that the compromise required slaves to work for a term of three to five years. However, it should be noted that the Three-Fifths Compromise did not establish any specific terms of service for slaves. It primarily dealt with the issue of counting enslaved individuals towards population and representation.
Overall, the statement highlights various aspects and implications of the Three-Fifths Compromise, including its differential treatment of enslaved individuals and its impact on representation in Congress.
Using the answers I provided, what are the correct answers??
I apologize for any confusion caused earlier. Based on the answers you provided, here are the correct interpretations:
1. Representatives and direct taxes apportioned based on population: The statement implies that the allocation of representatives and direct taxes would be determined by the population of each state. This would involve counting free persons, including indentured servants, and counting three-fifths of enslaved individuals.
2. Opposition from Northern states: The statement correctly states that the northern states did not agree to this apportionment method. Many northern states opposed counting enslaved individuals as part of a state's population, as they believed it would give slave states an unfair advantage in representation and influence.
3. Increased representation for slave states: The Three-Fifths Compromise did indeed benefit slave states by allowing them to count three-fifths of their enslaved population towards their representation in Congress. This effectively granted slave states more seats in the House of Representatives and greater political clout.
4. Required terms of service for slaves: It should be noted that the Three-Fifths Compromise did not include any requirements for the terms of service for slaves. The compromise solely pertained to the counting of enslaved individuals for population and representation calculations.
I hope this clarifies the correct interpretations based on the answers you provided.
He shall have power by and with the advice and consent of the senate to make treaties provided two thirds of the senators present concur and he shall nominate and by and with the advice and consent of the senate shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States
Federalism requires that powers be shared between state and federal governments
The constitution requires that the presidents actions be reviewed by the courts
The president must get approval of the states
The constitution requires that the presidents nominations to the Supreme Court be approved by the senate
The correct answer is: "The constitution requires that the president's nominations to the Supreme Court be approved by the Senate."
The statement you provided discusses the president's power to make treaties and appoint various government officials with the advice and consent of the Senate. Among these appointments are ambassadors, other public ministers, consuls, judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States. The Constitution mandates that the president's nominations to the Supreme Court, specifically, be approved by the Senate. This is a crucial check and balance in the nomination and appointment process, ensuring that the president's choices for the Supreme Court undergo scrutiny and approval by the Senate.
Why did delegates from most states initially meet in Philadelphia in 1787
To debate the admission of slave states to the union
To repeal the Northwest oridance
To amend the articles of confederation
To ratify the constitution and the bill of rights
The correct answer is: "To amend the Articles of Confederation."
In 1787, delegates from most states met in Philadelphia for the purpose of revising the existing Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation, which had served as the first constitution of the United States, were proving to be ineffective in providing a strong central government and faced various challenges in its implementation.
The delegates recognized the need for a stronger federal government that could better address the country's political and economic challenges. They aimed to amend the Articles of Confederation to create a more efficient and effective system of governance.
However, as the discussions progressed, it became clear that amending the Articles would not be sufficient, and the decision was made to draft an entirely new constitution. This gave rise to the Constitutional Convention, which ultimately led to the creation and ratification of the United States Constitution in 1787 and 1788, respectively.
The ratification of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights occurred after the Convention and were separate processes that took place subsequent to the initial meeting in Philadelphia.
During the constitutional convention and ratification process, delegates argued about how to solve certain problems. Choose which solution was for which problem.
Questions:
How many national representatives to have per state
How to protect citizens from an abuse of government powers
How to figure out population numbers for slave states
How to elect a president
Answers:
Great Compromise
Electoral College
Three-Fifths Compromise
Bill of Rights