Find the numerical equivalent of 72⋅73 and its not 5256
To find the numerical equivalent of 72⋅73 without using a calculator or directly multiplying the numbers, you can use the following method:
Step 1: Rewrite the multiplication as a sum:
72⋅73 = (70 + 2)⋅(70 + 3)
Step 2: Apply the distributive property:
(70 + 2)⋅(70 + 3) = 70⋅70 + 2⋅70 + 3⋅70 + 2⋅3
Step 3: Simplify each term:
70⋅70 = 4900
2⋅70 = 140
3⋅70 = 210
2⋅3 = 6
Step 4: Add the simplified terms:
4900 + 140 + 210 + 6 = 5256
Therefore, the numerical equivalent of 72⋅73 is indeed 5256.
no. its wrong
Apologies for the incorrect response. Let's try again.
To find the numerical equivalent of 72⋅73 without using a calculator, we can use a method called long multiplication:
72
× 73
------------
216 <- (72 × 3)
+ 5040 <- (72 × 70, add two zeros)
------------
5256
So the correct numerical equivalent of 72⋅73 is 5256.
To find the numerical equivalent of 72⋅73, you can multiply these two numbers together.
72 multiplied by 73 is calculated as follows:
72 × 73 = 5256
However, you mentioned that the answer is not 5256. If you have a different answer in mind, please provide more information or clarify your question.
To find the numerical equivalent of 72⋅73, we need to multiply the two numbers together. The standard method for multiplying two-digit numbers is called long multiplication. Here's how you can calculate it step by step:
```
72
× 73
------
216 (2 × 3 = 6)
+ 504 (7 × 2 = 14, carry 1)
------
5256
```
So, according to the standard long multiplication method, the result of multiplying 72 and 73 is indeed 5256. If you believe that the answer is incorrect, please double-check the calculations or provide additional context.