read the article to answer the question.
Article ll section 2.2
he shall have power, buy in with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties, provided 2/3 of the senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the senate, shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers, and consuls, judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the united state
How does this section of the constitution support checks and balances?
a. The constitution requires that the president actions be reviewed by the courts.
b. The president must get approval of the states.
c. Federalism requires that powers be shared between state and federal governments.
d. The constitution requires that the presidents nominations to the Supreme Court be approved by the Senate.
d. The constitution requires that the presidents nominations to the Supreme Court be approved by the Senate.
The correct answer is d. The constitution requires that the president's nominations to the Supreme Court be approved by the Senate. This section of the Constitution supports checks and balances by requiring the president to seek the advice and consent of the Senate when appointing judges of the Supreme Court. This ensures that there is a level of accountability and oversight in the appointment process, preventing any one branch of government from exerting excessive power.
The answer to this question can be found by analyzing Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the United States Constitution. This clause outlines the power of the President to make treaties and appoint various officials, subject to the advice and consent of the Senate. By understanding the content of this clause, we can determine how it supports checks and balances.
According to the clause, the President has the authority to make treaties, but they must be ratified by a two-thirds majority vote in the Senate. This requirement ensures that the President's treaty-making powers are checked by the Senate's oversight and approval process. Therefore, option (b), "The president must get approval of the states," is not supported by this clause.
Furthermore, the clause also specifies that the President shall appoint "judges of the Supreme Court, and all other officers of the United States," but these nominations require the advice and consent of the Senate. This process acts as a form of check on the President's power to appoint officials, as the Senate has the ability to reject or approve these nominations. Thus, option (d), "The constitution requires that the president's nominations to the Supreme Court be approved by the Senate," is supported by this clause.
Although options (a) and (c) do not directly relate to the provisions mentioned in the clause, they are fundamental principles underlying the system of checks and balances in the United States Constitution. Option (a), "The constitution requires that the President's actions be reviewed by the courts," is an example of the judiciary branch acting as a check on the President's powers. Option (c), "Federalism requires that powers be shared between state and federal governments," refers to the division of powers between the federal government and the states, which is another aspect of the checks and balances system.
In summary, option (d) is the answer to the question as it directly aligns with the provision in Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution. However, options (a) and (c) should also be acknowledged as they highlight broader principles of checks and balances in the Constitution.