who argues with The impact of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Toulmin Argumentative Essay
In the Toulmin argumentative essay on the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in higher education, numerous stakeholders would engage in the debate. These individuals would present their perspectives, evidence, and reasoning to support or challenge the assertion made in the essay. The essay would present various elements of the Toulmin model, such as the claim, evidence, warrant, backing, and counterarguments.
1. Claim: The claim in this essay would focus on the impact of AI in higher education, stating whether it is positive, negative, or a mix of both.
2. Evidence: Supporters of AI implementation in higher education would present evidence such as improved accessibility to education, personalized learning experiences, and enhanced efficiency in administrative tasks. They would provide specific examples of AI technologies like virtual tutors, intelligent tutoring systems, and automated grading systems used in higher education institutions.
3. Warrant: The warrant in the Toulmin model pertains to the assumption that the evidence presented supports the claim. In the case of AI in higher education, the warrant would be that the positive impact of AI technologies is significant enough to justify its implementation in the sector. This would be based on evidence showing increased student engagement, better learning outcomes, and streamlined administrative processes.
4. Backing: The backing involves further evidence, facts, or additional arguments that support the warrant. In this case, the backing would include research studies, reports from academic institutions, and expert testimonials that support the positive impact of AI in higher education.
5. Counterarguments: Opponents of AI in higher education would present counterarguments suggesting potential negative impacts, such as job displacement for educators, privacy concerns related to data collection, and overreliance on technology. These counterarguments would need to be addressed and refuted with counter evidence and reasoning.
By structuring the Toulmin argumentative essay on the impact of AI in higher education, the writer can thoroughly address all the relevant aspects of the debate while promoting critical thinking and a comprehensive analysis of the topic.
In order to identify who argues for or against the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in higher education, we would need to refer to the specific essay or research paper in question. However, I can provide a general outline of how arguments regarding this topic can be presented using the Toulmin method.
1. Claim: The impact of Artificial Intelligence in higher education is positive.
- Supporters of this claim would argue that AI technology has the potential to enhance learning outcomes, improve access to education, and increase efficiency in various educational processes.
2. Grounds: Evidence supporting the claim.
- Arguments in favor of the positive impact of AI in higher education can cite studies, research papers, or real-life examples showcasing the effectiveness of AI-powered tools and platforms in facilitating personalized learning, automating administrative tasks, and providing timely feedback to students.
3. Warrant: The reasoning or principles that connect the grounds to the claim.
- The warrant might include the idea that AI technologies, when properly implemented and ethically used, can improve instructional practices, enhance student engagement, and enable educators to focus on higher-order skills such as critical thinking and creativity.
4. Backing: Additional support or evidence for the warrant.
- Backing for the warrant could include empirical studies on the effectiveness of AI-based educational tools, expert opinions from educators or researchers, or success stories from institutions that have implemented AI technologies in their educational systems.
5. Rebuttal: Addressing potential counterarguments.
- Opposing views could argue that AI technology may replace human teachers, compromise student privacy, or exacerbate inequalities in access to education. Proponents of the positive impact of AI in higher education would need to provide counterarguments, such as the potential for enhanced teacher-student interaction, robust data privacy measures, and efforts to ensure equitable access to AI tools.
6. Qualifiers: Acknowledging limitations or scope of the argument.
- It is essential to recognize the limitations or potential risks associated with AI in higher education, such as bias in algorithms, the need for teacher training, or the importance of ethical considerations.
Again, the specific arguments made in a Toulmin essay on the impact of AI in higher education would depend on the author's perspective and the content of the essay itself.
In order to find an argumentative essay that specifically argues against the impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in higher education, you can follow these steps:
1. Start by performing a search on academic databases or websites that provide access to scholarly articles and essays. Some popular databases include JSTOR, Google Scholar, and ProQuest.
2. Use appropriate keywords to narrow down your search. For example, you could use combinations such as "Artificial Intelligence," "Higher Education," "Toulmin Argumentative Essay," and "against impact."
3. Review the search results and read the abstracts or summaries of the articles to determine if they match your criteria. Look for any essays or articles that specifically argue against the impact of AI in higher education.
4. Once you have identified potential sources, access the full texts either through your institution's library or by purchasing/renting the articles.
5. Read the selected essay(s) carefully, paying attention to the author's arguments, evidence, and analysis. Take notes and identify the main points and counter-arguments the author presents.
It's important to note that finding an exact Toulmin argumentative essay arguing against the impact of AI in higher education may not be guaranteed. However, following the steps mentioned above and being resourceful in conducting your search will increase your chances of finding relevant sources and essays that present various viewpoints on the topic.