All of the following will decrease the supply of train trips
except
Part 2
A.
a technological change that makes trains
safer and more fuel-efficient.
B.
an increase in the salaries of conductors
.
C.
a rise in the price of train fuel
.
D.
a reduction in the number of train
companies offering service.
B. an increase in the salaries of conductors.
The option that would not decrease the supply of train trips is:
A. a technological change that makes trains safer and more fuel-efficient.
This is because a technological change that improves the safety and fuel efficiency of trains would likely increase the supply of train trips by making them more attractive and cost-effective options for transportation.
To determine which option does not decrease the supply of train trips, let's analyze each option and its impact on the supply:
A. A technological change that makes trains safer and more fuel-efficient: This option may lead to an increase in the supply of train trips. It suggests that trains are becoming safer and more fuel-efficient, which could encourage more people to choose train travel, ultimately increasing the supply.
B. An increase in the salaries of conductors: This option could potentially decrease the supply of train trips. If conductor salaries increase, it might result in higher operating costs for train companies. To offset these costs, train companies may reduce their overall trips, leading to a decrease in the supply.
C. A rise in the price of train fuel: This option is likely to decrease the supply of train trips. If the price of train fuel increases, it becomes more expensive for train companies to operate. As a result, some companies may reduce their service or the frequency of trips, leading to a decrease in the supply.
D. A reduction in the number of train companies offering service: This option would also decrease the supply of train trips. If fewer train companies offer service, there would be fewer options available, resulting in decreased supply.
Therefore, the correct answer is option A. A technological change that makes trains safer and more fuel-efficient does not decrease the supply of train trips.