What would an economist expect if the negative incentives for bad behavior in a school became stricter?
(1 point)
Responses
Students would be less likely to break the rules, because the expectations are clearer.
Students would be less likely to break the rules, because the expectations are clearer.
Students would be less likely to break the rules, because punishments have become worse.
Students would be less likely to break the rules, because punishments have become worse.
Students would be more likely to break the rules, because more rules are available to break.
Students would be more likely to break the rules, because more rules are available to break.
Students would be more likely to break the rules, because the feelings of excitement are higher.
An economist would expect that students would be less likely to break the rules because the expectations are clearer.
An economist would expect that if the negative incentives for bad behavior in a school became stricter, students would be less likely to break the rules because the expectations are clearer and punishments have become worse.
An economist would expect that if the negative incentives for bad behavior in a school became stricter, students would be less likely to break the rules. This is because the expectations are clearer and the punishments have become worse.
To arrive at this answer, an economist analyzes the impact of incentives on human behavior. Stricter negative incentives, such as harsher punishments for rule-breaking, create a stronger deterrent for students. The clarity of expectations also plays a role in reducing bad behavior because students are more aware of the consequences they will face if they break the rules.
On the other hand, it is less likely that students would be more likely to break the rules if the negative incentives became stricter. More rules being available to break would not necessarily encourage rule-breaking, as the presence of stricter punishments would still act as a deterrent. Similarly, the notion that students would be more likely to break the rules because of higher feelings of excitement is not supported by economic reasoning, as stricter negative incentives generally dampen the motivation for rule-breaking.