Which would be considered a reliable source?(1 point)
Responses
a blog written by an anonymous author
a blog written by an anonymous author
an opinion column in your favorite magazine
an opinion column in your favorite magazine
an article from a scientific journal
an article from a scientific journal
a biology textbook from 1920
an article from a scientific journal
Which statement illustrates bias in scientific research?(1 point)
Responses
A botanist publishes data about plant growth that does not support their original hypothesis and is replicable.
A botanist publishes data about plant growth that does not support their original hypothesis and is replicable.
A zoologist publishes incomplete data on sloths which supports their original hypothesis and notes that more research is required.
A zoologist publishes incomplete data on sloths which supports their original hypothesis and notes that more research is required.
A microbiologist publishes data funded by the National Institutes of Health that does not support their original hypothesis.
A microbiologist publishes data funded by the National Institutes of Health that does not support their original hypothesis.
An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered.
An ecologist publishes data funded by a construction company which supports their original hypothesis that an endangered animal's territory is not endangered.
Which question can be used to evaluate reliability of a source?(1 point)
Responses
“Is the research peer-reviewed?"
“Is the research peer-reviewed?"
“Is this research relevant to me?”
“Is this research relevant to me?”
“Is this data challenged by anyone in the public?”
“Is this data challenged by anyone in the public?”
"Is the author American?"
“Is the research peer-reviewed?"
Validity refers to(1 point)
Responses
accuracy.
accuracy.
originality.
originality.
reliability.
reliability.
consistency.
accuracy.
To corroborate information is to(1 point)
Responses
find evidence that disproves a scientific position.
find evidence that disproves a scientific position.
find evidence that opposes a scientific position.
find evidence that opposes a scientific position.
find evidence that supports a scientific position.
find evidence that supports a scientific position.
find evidence that proves a scientific position.
find evidence that supports a scientific position.
The reliable source among the given options is an article from a scientific journal. To determine the reliability of a source, it is important to consider the credibility, expertise, and accuracy of the information provided.
An article from a scientific journal is generally considered more reliable because it undergoes a rigorous peer-review process where experts in the relevant field evaluate the research methodology, data, and conclusions before publication. This ensures that the information is accurate, well-researched, and meets the standards of the scientific community.
On the other hand, a blog written by an anonymous author, regardless of the topic, does not provide transparency or verifiability of the author's credentials or sources. This lack of accountability makes it difficult to assess the reliability and accuracy of the information presented.
Similarly, an opinion column in your favorite magazine may offer subjective viewpoints and personal opinions, which may not always be supported by evidence or factual information. While opinion columns can provide insights and perspectives, they do not typically meet the criteria for reliable sources.
Lastly, a biology textbook from 1920 may be outdated and may not reflect current scientific knowledge and discoveries. It is important to use up-to-date sources to ensure accuracy and reliability in the information obtained.
In summary, when evaluating sources for reliability, it is advisable to prioritize peer-reviewed scientific journals as they undergo a rigorous review process.