Use the excerpt from the “How the pandemic has complicated voting access for millions of Native Americans” article to answer the question.
Why does the author leave uncertain whether the efforts of Native organizers impacted voter turnout?
A) They wanted the reader to make an optimistic prediction about the 2020 election.
B) They wanted the reader to draw a realistic conclusion.
C) The article was published before the 2020 election took place.
D) The article relies heavily on implied instead of explicit meaning.
C) The article was published before the 2020 election took place.
D) The article relies heavily on implied instead of explicit meaning.
To answer the question, we need to refer to the excerpt from the article "How the pandemic has complicated voting access for millions of Native Americans." However, since the excerpt is not provided, I cannot directly analyze it. However, I can provide a general explanation of why an author might leave uncertain whether the efforts of Native organizers impacted voter turnout.
One possible reason could be that the author wants to present an unbiased perspective and allow readers to come to their own conclusions based on the available information. By leaving the impact of Native organizers uncertain, the author may aim to encourage critical thinking and independent analysis, rather than imposing a specific viewpoint.
Additionally, if the article relies heavily on implied meaning rather than explicit statements, the author might leave the impact uncertain to provoke reader engagement and encourage deeper consideration of the topic at hand. This could be done by presenting various perspectives, analyzing different factors, or leaving room for interpretation.
Ultimately, without the specific excerpt from the article, it is difficult to determine the author's intentions or the precise reason for leaving the impact of Native organizers uncertain.