What is the difference between a limited war and a total war? (1 point)
A.Limited war targets civilians and infrastructure because it has a limited scope of focus, white total war targets everything because it has no focus.
B.Limited war focuses on destroying the enemy and has a limited goal. With total war, the goals are not limited and are often numerous and specific
C.Limited war does not target civilians or intrastructure because of the rules of engagement that both sides agree to ahead of time. Total war does not have agreed-upon rules of engagement
D.Limited war does not target civilians or infrastructure because the invading force is planning to keep the land they conquer With a total war those limits do not exist because the goal is destruction of the enemy
The correct answer is B. Limited war focuses on destroying the enemy with a limited goal, while total war does not have limited goals and often has numerous and specific objectives.
To arrive at this answer, we need to understand the definitions of limited war and total war.
Limited war refers to a conflict in which the involved parties have specific objectives and restrict their use of military force to achieve those objectives. In limited war, there is typically a defined scope of focus and targeted use of military force. This means that the war is not aimed at total destruction, but rather achieving specific goals while minimizing collateral damage.
On the other hand, total war is a conflict that involves the complete mobilization of resources and populations. In total war, there are no limits on the goals, and the objectives often include the destruction of the enemy's military capabilities, infrastructure, and sometimes even civilians. Total war is characterized by its widespread and indiscriminate targeting due to the absence of agreed-upon rules of engagement.
Considering these definitions, option B accurately explains the difference between limited war and total war.