As a general rule, in the name of science, researchers should not conduct studies that may be harmful to subjects , particularly if the potential harm has not been explained to the subjects and their informed consent elicited . True False
As a general rule, in the name of science, researchers should not conduct studies that may be harmful to subjects , particularly if the potential harm has not been explained to the subjects and their informed consent elicited . True False
True
True.
As a general rule, in the name of scientific ethics, researchers should prioritize the well-being and rights of human subjects involved in studies. This includes not conducting studies that may be harmful to subjects unless they have been fully informed about the potential risks and have given their informed consent.
To determine if the statement is true or false, we need to assess whether it aligns with the ethical guidelines and principles that researchers follow when conducting studies involving human subjects.
In the field of research ethics, it is generally accepted that researchers should not conduct studies that may be harmful to subjects without their informed consent. Informed consent is the process of obtaining voluntary agreement from individuals, after they have been provided with relevant information about the study, including potential risks and benefits. Subjects should have a clear understanding of the potential harms involved before deciding to participate.
Therefore, the answer to whether the statement is true or false is: True. Researchers should not conduct studies that may be harmful to subjects without their informed consent, particularly if the potential harm has not been explained to the subjects. This principle ensures the protection and well-being of individuals involved in research studies.