Use the excerpt from the “How Nellie Bly went undercover to expose abuse of the mentally ill” article to answer the question.

Which of the following would be an invalid inference to make about this excerpt?

(1 point)
Responses

Only someone who was medically qualified could declare someone mentally insane.
Only someone who was medically qualified could declare someone mentally insane.

People considered the mentally insane to be unable to determine their own status.
People considered the mentally insane to be unable to determine their own status.

The mentally insane were considered a danger to society.
The mentally insane were considered a danger to society.

People found it important to give the mentally insane a safe place to live.

Invalid inference: Only someone who was medically qualified could declare someone mentally insane.

Based on the given excerpt, the invalid inference would be "Only someone who was medically qualified could declare someone mentally insane." This statement is not directly supported by the information provided in the excerpt.

To answer the question about which of the following would be an invalid inference to make about the excerpt, we need to analyze the provided text and evaluate each statement.

The excerpt from the article "How Nellie Bly went undercover to expose abuse of the mentally ill" is not provided in the question. However, based on the information you gave, we can speculate about the possible content of the text. The article likely discusses Nellie Bly's undercover investigation into the mistreatment of mentally ill individuals.

Now, let's evaluate each statement provided and determine if it can be inferred from the excerpt:

1. Only someone who was medically qualified could declare someone mentally insane.

This statement could be a valid inference since the article might mention the role of medical professionals in diagnosing and determining the mental illness of individuals.

2. People considered the mentally insane to be unable to determine their own status.

This statement could be a valid inference since it is commonly understood that mental illness can impair a person's ability to make rational judgments about their own condition.

3. The mentally insane were considered a danger to society.

This statement could be a valid inference if the article discusses societal perceptions of mentally ill individuals as potential threats to public safety.

4. People found it important to give the mentally insane a safe place to live.

This statement could be a valid inference as the article might address the need for providing a secure and supportive environment for the mentally ill.

Based on the analysis, it appears that all the statements provided could be valid inferences based on the subject matter of the excerpt. Therefore, none of the options would be an invalid inference to make about the excerpt.