What distinguishes sound generalizations from misleading oversimplifications in historians’ work?(1 point)

Responses

the use of specific historic evidence
the use of specific historic evidence

Unlike generalizations, oversimplifications are always wrong.
Unlike generalizations, oversimplifications are always wrong.

comparisons between too many historical events
comparisons between too many historical events

Oversimplifications come from asking the wrong questions.

the use of specific historic evidence

The use of specific historic evidence is what distinguishes sound generalizations from misleading oversimplifications in historians' work. Unlike generalizations, oversimplifications are always wrong. This means that historians need to base their generalizations on concrete, specific evidence from the past in order to ensure accuracy and avoid oversimplifying complex historical events. Additionally, historians should avoid making comparisons between too many historical events as this can also lead to misleading oversimplifications. Oversimplifications can often arise from asking the wrong questions or failing to consider the complexity and nuances of historical events.