the video:RC Unit 3: Demo - Cathode Ray Tube
Does Evidence 1 better support the solid sphere model or the plum pudding model. Explain your reasoning.(2pts)
In order to determine whether Evidence 1 better supports the solid sphere model or the plum pudding model, we need to refer to the given video "RC Unit 3: Demo - Cathode Ray Tube" for context. Unfortunately, as an AI text-based model, I don't have access to the specific content of the video. However, I can provide you with some general information about these models to help you draw a conclusion.
The solid sphere model, also known as the nuclear model, was proposed by Ernest Rutherford. According to this model, atoms consist of a small, dense nucleus at the center, which contains protons and neutrons, while electrons orbit around the nucleus.
On the other hand, the plum pudding model, proposed by J.J. Thomson, suggests that atoms are composed of a positively charged pudding-like material with negatively charged electrons embedded throughout it.
Based on this information, I can provide some analysis. If Evidence 1 shows characteristics that support the presence of a small, dense nucleus at the center of the atom, it would align with the solid sphere model. Additionally, if it indicates electrons orbiting around the nucleus, it would further support this model.
However, if Evidence 1 suggests that there is a pudding-like material with electrons embedded throughout it, it would lean towards the plum pudding model.
Without specific details about Evidence 1 from the video, it is not possible to make a definite conclusion. It would require further examination and analysis of the evidence to determine whether it aligns more with the solid sphere model or the plum pudding model.
To determine whether Evidence 1 better supports the solid sphere model or the plum pudding model in the video "RC Unit 3: Demo - Cathode Ray Tube," we need to analyze the characteristics of the evidence and compare them to the features of each model.
The solid sphere model, also known as the Thomson model, proposes that atoms are composed of a uniform, positively charged sphere with negatively charged electrons embedded within it. On the other hand, the plum pudding model, also known as the Thomson model, suggests that atoms consist of a positively charged sphere with negatively charged electrons dispersed within it, resembling plums in a pudding.
Considering the characteristics observed in Evidence 1, if the video explicitly demonstrates that the electrons (negatively charged particles) are deflected by a positive charge, this finding would support the plum pudding model. In the plum pudding model, the electrons should be able to move around freely within the positively charged sphere and, therefore, be affected by a positive charge.
However, if the video shows that the electrons are unable to move or are not deflected, it would align more with the solid sphere model. According to the solid sphere model, since all the negative charges (electrons) are embedded within the positive charge in a uniformly distributed manner, they would not be affected by an additional external positive charge.
Therefore, to answer whether Evidence 1 better supports the solid sphere model or the plum pudding model, we would need to analyze the specific observations made in the video regarding the behavior of electrons when exposed to a positive charge.