What happens when new evidence is found that contradicts part of a theory?(1 point)
Responses
Science reevaluates the validity of the theory.
Science reevaluates the validity of the theory.
The theory is discarded for a new one.
The theory is discarded for a new one.
It gets ignored to maintain the original idea.
It gets ignored to maintain the original idea.
New pieces are added to the original ideas.
Science reevaluates the validity of the theory.
How does a hypothesis differ from a scientific theory?(1 point)
Responses
Hypotheses can change with new evidence, but theories remain constant.
Hypotheses can change with new evidence, but theories remain constant.
Theories are well established with lots of evidence to support their claims.
Theories are well established with lots of evidence to support their claims.
Theories always lead to the development of new scientific ideas.
Theories always lead to the development of new scientific ideas.
Hypotheses are testable, while theories only exist conditionally.
Theories are well established with lots of evidence to support their claims.
How is a hypothesis similar to theory?(1 point)
Responses
Both a hypothesis and a theory need evidence to support them.
Both a hypothesis and a theory need evidence to support them.
Both a hypothesis and a theory are statements supported by data.
Both a hypothesis and a theory are statements supported by data.
Both a hypothesis and a theory are accepted as true statements.
Both a hypothesis and a theory are accepted as true statements.
Both a hypothesis and a theory explain why things happen.
Both a hypothesis and a theory need evidence to support them.
1. Science reevaluates the validity of the theory.
New evidence that contradicts part of a theory often leads scientists to reevaluate the validity of the theory. They will examine the new evidence, analyze its significance, and consider how it affects the existing theory. This process allows scientists to modify, refine, or even discard the theory based on the strength and implications of the new evidence.
The correct answer is: Science reevaluates the validity of the theory.
When new evidence is found that contradicts part of a theory, the scientific process involves reevaluating the validity of the theory. This is because science is a self-correcting process that relies on evidence and experimentation to build knowledge and understanding.
To understand why science reevaluates the validity of the theory, it is important to understand the scientific method. The scientific method is a systematic approach used to investigate phenomena and acquire knowledge. It typically involves the following steps:
1. Observation: Scientists carefully observe and gather information about a particular phenomenon or situation.
2. Hypothesis: Based on their observations, scientists develop a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation for the observed phenomenon.
3. Prediction: Scientists make predictions or propose experiments to test the hypothesis.
4. Testing: Scientists conduct experiments or perform tests to gather data that will either support or refute the hypothesis.
5. Analysis: Scientists analyze the data collected from the experiments to draw conclusions.
6. Conclusion: Based on the analysis of the data, scientists either reject or accept the hypothesis. If the hypothesis is accepted, it may be considered a theory, which is a well-substantiated explanation that is supported by evidence and has withstood rigorous testing.
When new evidence emerges that contradicts part of a theory, scientists reevaluate the validity of the theory through further experimentation and analysis. They examine the new evidence and compare it with the existing body of knowledge to assess its credibility and implications. If the new evidence is deemed reliable and reproducible, it may require modifying the theory or even discarding it and proposing a new one. This process of reassessment and modification is crucial for the advancement of scientific knowledge and understanding.