paraphrase this In interim constitution the police docket privilege was found ,which gave prosecutor a privilege not disclose the contents of the police docket to an accused person this privileged originated in R v Steyn 1954. Chapter 3 of the interim constitution found the privilege to be inconsistent with it. In Shabalala V Attorney—General of the Transvaal case In this case the court decided to significantly reduce the provisions as the results
The interim constitution originally included a privilege for the police to withhold information from the accused, known as the police docket privilege. This privilege, established in the 1954 case R v Steyn, allowed prosecutors to keep the contents of the police docket a secret. However, Chapter 3 of the interim constitution deemed this privilege to be contradictory to its principles. In the Shabalala V Attorney—General of the Transvaal case, the court decided to significantly decrease the provisions of the privilege, in response to the findings.
In the interim constitution, a privilege regarding the police docket was established. This privilege allowed prosecutors to withhold the contents of the police docket from the accused. This privilege was first established in the R v Steyn case in 1954. However, Chapter 3 of the interim constitution deemed this privilege to be inconsistent with its provisions. In the Shabalala V Attorney-General of the Transvaal case, the court made a decision to significantly decrease the extent of these provisions.
