The Doctrine of Frustration is a legal principle that applies when unforeseen circumstances arise that make it impossible to fulfill the terms of a contract. These circumstances may be beyond the control of either party and could include events such as natural disasters, war, or government interventions. When the Doctrine of Frustration applies, it releases both parties from their contractual obligations and prevents either party from seeking legal remedies for breach of contract. The effect of frustration on a contract is that it essentially brings the contract to an end and relieves the parties from further performance.
The doctrine of frustration is a legal principle that may be invoked to discharge a contract when unforeseen events occur that make it impossible to perform or fundamentally change the nature of the contract. It provides a remedy in situations where performance becomes impossible, illegal, or radically different from what was initially anticipated. When the doctrine of frustration is successfully invoked, the contract is terminated and the parties are relieved from their future obligations. In such cases, any money or benefits already provided under the contract may be recoverable, but neither party will be liable for further performance. It is important to note that the doctrine of frustration is only applicable in exceptional circumstances where the occurrence of an event has made the contract impossible to perform.
