A student claims that earthquakes are more destructive than tsunamis. In one or two sentences, explain at least two reasons that support the student’s claim.
To support the student's claim that earthquakes are more destructive than tsunamis, two reasons can be highlighted. Firstly, earthquakes can cause significant damage not only through ground shaking but also by triggering secondary hazards like landslides and even tsunamis themselves. Secondly, earthquakes can occur more frequently and in various locations worldwide, making them a more pervasive threat compared to localized tsunamis.
One reason that supports the student's claim is that earthquakes can cause widespread damage over a larger area compared to tsunamis, which generally affect coastal regions. Additionally, earthquakes can lead to secondary hazards such as landslides and fires, further increasing their destructive impact.
The student's claim can be supported by two reasons:
1. Earthquakes have the potential to cause widespread destruction over a larger area than tsunamis. They can lead to the collapse of buildings, infrastructure damage, landslides, and even trigger secondary hazards like fires and tsunamis themselves.
2. Earthquakes produce strong ground shaking, which can cause immediate damage to structures and buildings, leading to loss of life and extensive damage. Meanwhile, tsunamis primarily affect coastal areas, causing significant damage to shoreline infrastructure, buildings, and coastal communities but with a more localized impact.