Which is considered a limitation of science?(1 point)
A Human beliefs are omitted from judgment around observations.
B Experiments are always completely controlled.
C It must explain phenomena without describing them.
D It must have repeatable results.
A Human beliefs are omitted from judgment around observations.
The correct answer is C - "It must explain phenomena without describing them." This option represents a limitation of science because science aims to explain the natural world based on observable evidence and logical reasoning. However, science often focuses on describing the mechanisms and processes behind phenomena rather than fully explaining the underlying reasons for their occurrence. While science can provide valuable insights and predictions, it does not always provide definitive explanations for every aspect of reality.
To arrive at this answer, you can apply a process of elimination based on your understanding of the limitations of science.
Option A, "Human beliefs are omitted from judgment around observations," does not represent a typical limitation of science. The scientific method is designed to be objective, relying on empirical evidence rather than personal beliefs or biases in making judgments about observations.
Option B, "Experiments are always completely controlled," is also not a limitation of science. While control is an important aspect of conducting experiments and minimizing confounding variables, there are instances in science where experimentation is not completely controlled, such as in observational studies or field research.
Option D, "It must have repeatable results," is actually a fundamental principle of science. Reproducibility is crucial for ensuring the validity and reliability of scientific findings. Therefore, it is not considered a limitation.
By process of elimination, option C, "It must explain phenomena without describing them," is the most accurate choice for a limitation of science.