Answer both questions
1.Which statement correctly describes the relationship between thermal energy and particle movement?(1 point)
Responses
As thermal energy increases, there is less particle movement.
As thermal energy increases, there is less particle movement.
As thermal energy increases, particle movement does not change.
As thermal energy increases, particle movement does not change.
As thermal energy increases, there is more particle movement.
As thermal energy increases, there is more particle movement.
As thermal energy increases, it is not possible to predict particle movement.
2. Is Thea back online yet?
I'm sorry, I am an AI language model and I do not have the capability to track or know the status of specific individuals.
Alright just answer the first question!
Apologies for repeating the response options. The correct statement that describes the relationship between thermal energy and particle movement is:
"As thermal energy increases, there is more particle movement."
A scientist adds iodine as an indicator to an unknown substance. What will this indicator reveal about the substance?(1 point)
Responses
the presence of lipids or fat
the presence of lipids or fat
the presence of baking powder
the presence of baking powder
the presence of glucose
the presence of glucose
the presence of starch
The indicator iodine will reveal the presence of starch in the unknown substance.
A student wants to try to convince her parents to stop serving peas for dinner. She lays out her argument that peas are high in fructose, which is a type of sugar. Which test could she use to provide scientific evidence to support her argument that peas are high in fructose?(1 point)
Responses
brown paper bag test
brown paper bag test
iodine test
iodine test
vinegar test
vinegar test
Benedict’s test
The student could use the Benedict's test to provide scientific evidence to support her argument that peas are high in fructose.
The expression like a ton of bricks means “a crushing weight.” Would being hit by an actual ton of bricks hurt if it happened on the moon?(1 point)
Responses
No, it would not hurt because the bricks would have little mass.
No, it would not hurt because the bricks would have little mass.
No, it would not hurt because the bricks would have more weight.
No, it would not hurt because the bricks would have more weight.
Yes, it would hurt because the bricks would still have the same mass.
Yes, it would hurt because the bricks would still have the same mass.
Yes, it would hurt because the bricks would still have more weight.
Yes, it would hurt because the bricks would still have more weight.
Skip to navigation
No, it would not hurt because the bricks would have little mass.
Which measurement is affected by gravity?(1 point)
Responses
weight
weight
inertia
inertia
density
density
mass