Login or Sign Up
Menu
Ask a New Question

Which statement is evidence of different communities using empirical knowledge in different ways?(1 point)

Responses

Community A funds a program for home solar panels and community B builds a solar farm.
Community A funds a program for home solar panels and community B builds a solar farm.

Communities fund research based on the specific needs and interests of that area.
Communities fund research based on the specific needs and interests of that area.

Communities consider a wide range of solutions to their specific problems.
Communities consider a wide range of solutions to their specific problems.

Community A uses

empirical data on energy consumption to develop energy efficiency programs, while community B uses empirical data on renewable energy potential to develop renewable energy projects.

Which statement is evidence of different communities using empirical knowledge in different ways?(1 point)

Responses

Community A funds a program for home solar panels and community B builds a solar farm.
Community A funds a program for home solar panels and community B builds a solar farm.

Communities fund research based on the specific needs and interests of that area.
Communities fund research based on the specific needs and interests of that area.

Communities consider a wide range of solutions to their specific problems.
Communities consider a wide range of solutions to their specific problems.

Community A uses solar panels for electricity generation and community B uses wind turbines.

Community A uses solar panels for electricity generation and community B uses wind turbines.

In three to five sentences, explain what evidence you can use to distinguish between science and pseudoscience.

To distinguish between science and pseudoscience, one can look for several key pieces of evidence. Firstly, scientific claims are supported by empirical evidence obtained through rigorous experimentation and observation, whereas pseudoscientific claims often lack substantial evidence or rely on anecdotal experiences. Additionally, scientific theories must be falsifiable, meaning they can be tested and potentially proven wrong, while pseudoscience often lacks testability. The presence of peer-reviewed publications and scientific consensus is also a strong indicator of scientific validity, whereas pseudoscientific claims often lack such support. Lastly, adherence to the scientific method, which includes forming hypotheses, conducting experiments, and analyzing data objectively, is a crucial aspect of science, while pseudoscience often disregards or misinterprets this methodology.

Science addresses questions that can be answered through results of experiments that are observable and measurable. Its answers are reproducible when tested in the natural world.

Use one to two sentences to explain what is inferred from the paragraph

From the paragraph, it can be inferred that science relies on empirical evidence, experimentation, and observation to answer questions in a reproducible and measurable manner.

In one two two sentences, explain how context is assessed when researching a scientific topic

When researching a scientific topic, context is assessed by considering factors such as the existing body of knowledge, relevant theories, experimental design, and the broader scientific community's perspective. It also involves evaluating the reliability and credibility of the sources, the methodology used, and the potential biases or limitations that may affect the interpretation of the findings.

In one to two sentences, describe how a scientific inference is derived from an observation

A scientific inference is derived from an observation by drawing logical conclusions or making reasonable explanations based on the observed data, existing scientific theories, and prior knowledge. It involves connecting the observed evidence to broader patterns, principles, or causation in order to develop a deeper understanding of the phenomenon.

The first cosmic microwave background radiation was detected unexpectedly. In one to two sentences, explain how the scientists who detected the radiation recognized the strength of their discovery

The scientists who detected the cosmic microwave background radiation recognized the strength of their discovery by observing that the detected radiation matched the predicted characteristics of the afterglow of the Big Bang, providing strong evidence for the early stages of the universe and supporting the Big Bang theory.

In three to five sentences, describe how the scientific method leads to evidence for explanations of natural phenomena

The scientific method is a systematic approach that leads to evidence-based explanations of natural phenomena. It starts with making observations and asking questions, forming a hypothesis that provides a tentative explanation. Next, experiments and data collection are conducted to test the hypothesis. The gathered data is then analyzed and interpreted to draw conclusions. These conclusions, if consistent and supported by the evidence, can lead to the development of theories that explain the phenomena in question. Through this iterative process of observation, hypothesis testing, and theory development, scientific methods provide reliable evidence for understanding natural phenomena.

In three to five sentences, explain the role of creativity in constructing scientific questions, methods, and explanations.

Creativity plays a crucial role in constructing scientific questions, methods, and explanations. It involves thinking outside the box to generate novel and insightful inquiries about the natural world. Creative thinking helps scientists develop innovative approaches and methodologies to investigate these questions, allowing them to design experiments and gather data in unique ways. Moreover, creativity is essential in constructing explanations by connecting disparate observations, proposing new theories, or devising alternative interpretations of existing data. It fosters innovation and pushes the boundaries of scientific understanding.