Which of the following is an example of government's role of keeping order in society?(1 point)
Responses
operating a lottery
operating a lottery
issuing paper money
issuing paper money
taxing education
taxing education
prohibiting bartering
prohibiting bartering
prohibiting bartering
can u explain how u got this answer
I apologize for the confusion in my previous response. The correct answer is issuing paper money.
The government's role in keeping order in society includes maintaining a stable and functional economy. One way the government does this is by issuing and controlling the circulation of paper money. This ensures that there is a standardized medium of exchange that can be used for transactions, promoting economic stability and reducing the risk of fraud or counterfeit currency.
Operating a lottery and taxing education are not necessarily examples of the government's role in keeping order in society. While operating a lottery may generate revenue for the government, it is primarily a form of entertainment and revenue generation rather than directly maintaining order. Taxing education could be a means of generating revenue for the government but does not necessarily address the goal of keeping order in society.
Prohibiting bartering, on the other hand, could be seen as a way of regulating economic transactions and maintaining order by promoting the use of official currency. However, it is important to note that bartering is not universally prohibited and is still practiced in certain circumstances or within specific communities.
What do an autocratic government and an absolute monarchy have in common?(1 point)
Responses
A written constitution
A written constitution
A legislature
A legislature
One court system
One court system
One ruler
One ruler
can you explain this?
Certainly! An autocratic government and an absolute monarchy have in common the characteristic of having one ruler who holds ultimate power and authority.
In an autocratic government, power is concentrated in the hands of a single individual or a small group of individuals. The ruler or ruling elite exercises significant control over all aspects of governance, decision-making, and policy implementation. The ruler's authority is typically not limited by a constitution or by checks and balances from other branches of government. They have the final say in all matters of the state.
Similarly, in an absolute monarchy, all executive, legislative, and judicial powers are centralized in the hands of a monarch who has absolute authority. The monarch's power is typically hereditary, meaning it is passed down through generations within a single family. The ruler has the final word in all matters of state and is not bound by a written constitution or a legislature.
Both systems emphasize the concentration of power in the hands of one ruler, which distinguishes them from other forms of government that involve power-sharing, separation of powers, or constitutional limitations on authority.
In which government system is the state given the least power?(1 point)
Responses
unitary
unitary
parliamentary
parliamentary
federal
federal
confederal
The answer is confederal.
can you explainn this
Certainly! In a confederal government system, the state or regional governments possess the most power, while the central or national government has the least amount of power.
In a confederal system, the central government's authority is limited and derives its power from the regional or state governments. The regional or state governments retain a high degree of autonomy and have the ability to make decisions and take actions independently from the central government. The central government typically only has powers that have been explicitly delegated to it by the regional or state governments.
Confederal systems are often formed by sovereign states or regions coming together voluntarily to establish a central government to handle certain common interests, such as defense or foreign affairs. However, the regional or state governments in a confederal system generally maintain their sovereignty and have the ability to withdraw from the arrangement if they wish.
In contrast, in a unitary government system, the central government has the most power, with regional or local governments deriving their authority from the central government. In a federal government system, power is shared and divided between a central government and regional or state governments, with both levels of government possessing their own areas of authority. A parliamentary government system refers to a system in which the executive branch is accountable to the legislative branch, but the power distribution between the central and regional governments can vary depending on the specific structure of the system.
Compare and contrast dictatorship and monarchy. Give one similarity and one difference.
Sure! Here's a comparison and contrast between dictatorship and monarchy, along with one similarity and one difference:
Similarity:
One similarity between dictatorship and monarchy is that both forms of government involve a concentration of power in the hands of a single individual. In a dictatorship, the ruler holds absolute and unrestricted power over the state, while in a monarchy, the monarch holds significant power and authority.
Difference:
One key difference between dictatorship and monarchy is the basis of their authority. In a dictatorship, the ruler usually seizes power through force, military coup, or other means and does not inherit the position. The ruler's power in a dictatorship is typically not constrained by constitutional or legal limitations.
On the other hand, in a monarchy, the ruler's authority is usually inherited and passed down through a bloodline or lineage. The monarch's position is often hereditary, and their power is grounded in tradition, legitimacy, or sometimes religious beliefs. Monarchs usually have limited or constitutional powers, with their authority defined and constrained by a constitution, laws, or the political structure in place.
In summary, while both dictatorship and monarchy involve the concentration of power in a single ruler, the key difference lies in the basis of their authority - whether it is achieved through force and seizure of power (dictatorship) or inherited through a lineage or bloodline (monarchy).
sumarize it
Both dictatorship and monarchy involve a consolidation of power in the hands of a single individual. In a dictatorship, the leader seizes power through force or other means and has unrestricted authority. In contrast, in a monarchy, the ruler's authority is typically inherited through a bloodline and limited by a constitution or laws. The main difference between the two lies in how the ruler attains and maintains power - through seizure or inheritance.
Compare and contrast direct democracy and representative democracy. Give one similarity and one difference.
Certainly! Here's a comparison and contrast between direct democracy and representative democracy, along with one similarity and one difference:
Similarity:
One similarity between direct democracy and representative democracy is that both aim to involve citizens in the decision-making process of governance. In both systems, citizens have the opportunity to participate in shaping the policies and actions of the government.
Difference:
The main difference between direct democracy and representative democracy lies in how citizen participation takes place.
In a direct democracy, citizens directly participate in the decision-making process and directly vote on laws and policies. This means that citizens have a direct say in the legislative process, and their votes determine the outcome of specific issues. Direct democracy is often feasible in small communities or organizations.
On the other hand, in a representative democracy, citizens elect individuals to represent their interests and make decisions on their behalf. They vote for representatives who will act in the best interests of the voters and make decisions in the legislative process. Citizens have the power to choose their representatives but do not have the direct authority to vote on specific laws or policies themselves.
In summary, while both direct democracy and representative democracy aim to involve citizens in the decision-making process, the main difference lies in the mechanism of citizen participation. Direct democracy involves direct voting and decision-making by citizens themselves, while representative democracy involves electing individuals to represent citizens and make decisions on their behalf.