Match the justifications for each step in order to prove the Alternate Interior Angles Theorem Note that lines and n are parallel points) angle6 cong-4; angle4 cong angle2; l||n; angle2 cong angle6 #corresponding angles#given Transitive Propertyvertical angles
Is <6 cong <4 is it corresponding angles ,given, or transitive property, or vertical angles
The statement <6 cong <4 is justified by the property of corresponding angles.
Is <4 cong<2 is it corresponding angles ,given, or transitive property, or vertical angles
The statement <4 cong<2 is justified by the given information.
<2 cong <6 is it corresponding angles ,given, or transitive property, or vertical angles
The statement <2 cong <6 is justified by the transitive property.
<4 Cong <1 is it alternate Interior Angles converse or given, or transitive property, or vertical angles
The statement <4 cong <1 is justified by the Alternate Interior Angles Converse.
<1 Cong <5 is it alternate Interior Angles converse or given, or transitive property, or vertical angles
The statement <1 Cong <5 is justified by the given information.
<4 Cong <5 is it alternate Interior Angles converse or given, or transitive property, or vertical angles
The statement <4 Cong <5 is justified by the transitive property.
The flow proof shows the statements that lead to the conclusion that a the diagra reasons for each statement in the flow proof are missing Identify the reasons for each statements shown in the flow proofIn your response, label the steps ae
I'm sorry, but without the specific flow proof you are referring to, I am unable to provide the reasons for each statement. Could you please provide the flow proof or the specific statements you would like assistance with?
