Which of the following would most likely have been left behind in the Olduvai Gorge?
1. Stone tools
2. Animal bones
3. Fossilized plants
4. Artifacts made of bone or shell
The most likely item to have been left behind in the Olduvai Gorge is stone tools. This area is known for its rich collection of early stone tools, suggesting that early hominids used and discarded these tools in the gorge. Animal bones and fossilized plants can also be found in the Olduvai Gorge, but stone tools are a more distinct characteristic of this archaeological site. Artifacts made of bone or shell may be present, but they are less common compared to stone tools.
Which of the following would most likely have been left behind in the Olduvai Gorge?
(1 point)
Responses
australopithecine
australopithecine
Homo habilis
Homo habilis
Lucy
Lucy
Neanderthal
Of the given options, the most likely to have been left behind in the Olduvai Gorge would be Homo habilis. In 1959, Mary and Louis Leakey discovered the fossilized remains of this early human species in the Olduvai Gorge, suggesting that Homo habilis inhabited the area. Lucy, an Australopithecus afarensis fossil, was found in the Afar region of Ethiopia, not in the Olduvai Gorge. Neanderthals are associated with different regions and time periods, so their presence in the Olduvai Gorge is less likely.
What did the Leakeys discover in Olduvai Gorge?
(1 point)
Responses
an early human settlement
an early human settlement
prehistoric stone tools
prehistoric stone tools
a complete human skeleton
a complete human skeleton
sets of Neanderthal footprints
The Leakeys discovered prehistoric stone tools in the Olduvai Gorge. This collection of stone tools is significant as it provides evidence of early human activity in the area. They did not discover an early human settlement, a complete human skeleton, or sets of Neanderthal footprints in the Olduvai Gorge.
The person in the image is most likely to be a(n)
(1 point)
Responses
anthropologist.
anthropologist.
glaciologist.
glaciologist.
entomologist.
entomologist.
biologist.
Based on the given image, the person is most likely to be an anthropologist.
How do historians use evidence to learn about the past? Select all that apply.
(1 point)
Responses
They excavate the sources of evidence.
They excavate the sources of evidence.
They propose the meaning of evidence.
They propose the meaning of evidence.
They analyze the carbon-14 of evidence.
They analyze the carbon-14 of evidence.
They assess the reliability of evidence.
Historians use evidence to learn about the past in the following ways:
1. They excavate the sources of evidence: Historians often engage in archaeological excavations to uncover physical artifacts and structures that provide insights into past civilizations and events.
2. They propose the meaning of evidence: Historians analyze and interpret the evidence they find, making educated guesses or proposing theories about its significance and how it fits into the broader historical context.
3. They assess the reliability of evidence: Historians critically evaluate the credibility and accuracy of different sources of evidence, considering factors such as the source's bias, the proximity to the events being studied, and the corroboration with other sources.
Analyzing the carbon-14 of evidence, however, is mainly done by archaeologists and scientists specializing in dating techniques, rather than historians. Therefore, the response "They analyze the carbon-14 of evidence" is not applicable to historians specifically.
How do historians use evidence to learn about the past? 2 answers
(1 point)
Responses
They excavate the sources of evidence.
They excavate the sources of evidence.
They propose the meaning of evidence.
They propose the meaning of evidence.
They analyze the carbon-14 of evidence.
They analyze the carbon-14 of evidence.
They assess the reliability of evidence.