Which of the following might be considered a valid source for online research? Select all that apply.

(2 points)

the National Archives

a weblog of a guy who describes himself as a “history nerd”

a Wikipedia article

a weblog of a college history professor about her area of specialty

a org website that was last updated in 2008

a com website with its own online store

a gov website

a website with claims that you can’t verify at another source

the National Archives

a weblog of a college history professor about her area of specialty

a gov website

the National Archives yes

a weblog of a guy who describes himself as a “history nerd” no

a Wikipedia article yes

a weblog of a college history professor about her area of specialty yes

a org website that was last updated in 2008 no

a com website with its own online store no

a gov websiteyes

a website with claims that you can’t verify at another source no

The valid sources for online research among the options provided are:

- The National Archives
- A weblog of a college history professor about her area of specialty
- A gov website

Your revised answers are correct. The National Archives, a Wikipedia article, a weblog of a college history professor about her area of specialty, and a government website are all valid sources for online research. However, a weblog of a guy who describes himself as a "history nerd," a .org website that was last updated in 2008, a .com website with its own online store, and a website with unverifiable claims are not considered reliable sources for research.