A government meets to discuss policies about controlling pollution. Which is the most appropriate type of information for the government to use to make decisions?(1 point)

Responses

guesses about the impact of pollutants

personal anecdotes from citizens

research reports containing scientific data

stories from other governments

A patient reports side effects from a medication. A government committee learns about the side effects and decides the medication is not safe for public use. Did the committee use science to make the decision?(1 point)
Responses

Yes; all medicine is science.

No; the committee used an anecdote.

Yes; the committee used research.

No; committees use rules, not science.

Which type of research might result in a law that restricts hunting of a particular species?(1 point)
Responses

research showing a decrease in the popularity of hunting

research showing the species is endangered in other geographical areas

research showing an increase in the population of the species

research showing the species is harmful

Which statement best explains why a rare disease would get more research funding than a more common disease?(1 point)
Responses

Corporations refuse to fund research for rare diseases.

Organizations are concerned about the results of the research into the rare disease.

Sufferers of the rare disease ran a public awareness campaign.

Diseases that affect more people tend to get more funding.

A corporation funds scientific research to develop a fabric treatment that absorbs harmful rays from the sun. Which product does the corporation most likely manufacture?(1 point)
Responses

patio umbrellas

sunscreen

garden tools

batteries

sunscreen

could you answer the other ones?

Apologies for missing the other questions. Here are the answers:

1. The most appropriate type of information for the government to use to make decisions about controlling pollution is: research reports containing scientific data. This ensures that the decisions are based on reliable and factual information.

2. Yes, the government committee used science to make the decision about the medication. They assessed the reported side effects and made a determination based on scientific evidence. The committee used research to inform their decision.

3. The type of research that might result in a law that restricts hunting of a particular species is research showing that the species is endangered in other geographical areas. This information would highlight the need for conservation efforts and protective measures to preserve the species.

4. Diseases that affect more people tend to get more funding. This statement best explains why a rare disease would get more research funding than a more common disease. Funding decisions are often influenced by the impact of the disease on a larger population and the potential public health implications.

5. The corporation most likely manufactures sunscreen. The research and development of a fabric treatment to absorb harmful rays from the sun aligns with the purpose of creating an effective sunscreen product.

research reports containing scientific data

Yes; the committee used research.

research showing the species is endangered in other geographical areas

Diseases that affect more people tend to get more funding.

sunscreen

In order to answer these questions, we need to carefully read and analyze the information provided.

Question 1: A government meets to discuss policies about controlling pollution. Which is the most appropriate type of information for the government to use to make decisions?

It is important for the government to base their decisions on reliable and accurate information. Given the choices, the most appropriate type of information for the government to use would be "research reports containing scientific data." This is because scientific research provides evidence-based information that is backed by rigorous methodologies and data analysis.

Question 2: A patient reports side effects from a medication. A government committee learns about the side effects and decides the medication is not safe for public use. Did the committee use science to make the decision?

To determine if the committee used science to make the decision, we need to carefully analyze the information provided. The committee made the decision based on learning about the side effects of the medication. If they based their decision solely on the patient's report, it would be considered "anecdotal" and not necessarily scientific. However, if the committee conducted research and gathered scientific evidence to support their decision, then they did use science. Therefore, the answer depends on whether the committee used scientific research or relied solely on the patient's anecdote.

Question 3: Which type of research might result in a law that restricts hunting of a particular species?

In order to determine the type of research that might result in a law restricting hunting of a particular species, we need to consider the options provided. If the research shows "a decrease in the popularity of hunting," it might not necessarily warrant a law restricting hunting. Similarly, research showing "an increase in the population of the species" might not lead to restrictions. However, the most appropriate answer would be "research showing the species is endangered in other geographical areas." This type of research provides evidence of the species being at risk and in need of protection, which could result in the implementation of hunting restrictions.

Question 4: Which statement best explains why a rare disease would get more research funding than a more common disease?

To determine why a rare disease would get more research funding than a more common disease, we need to carefully analyze the options provided. The statement that best explains this scenario would be "Diseases that affect more people tend to get more funding." This is because common diseases often have a greater impact on public health, affecting a larger number of people and therefore attracting more attention and resources for research and treatment.

Question 5: A corporation funds scientific research to develop a fabric treatment that absorbs harmful rays from the sun. Which product does the corporation most likely manufacture?

Based on the information provided, the corporation is funding research to develop a fabric treatment that absorbs harmful rays from the sun. Given the options, the product that the corporation most likely manufactures would be "sunscreen." Sunscreen is a product that can be applied to the skin and absorbs harmful rays from the sun, providing protection against UV radiation.

In summary, the most appropriate type of information for a government to use in making decisions about controlling pollution would be research reports containing scientific data. Whether a government committee used science to make a decision about the safety of a medication depends on whether they relied solely on an anecdote or conducted scientific research. Research showing that a species is endangered in other geographical areas might result in a law that restricts hunting. A rare disease may receive more research funding than a more common disease because diseases that affect more people tend to receive more funding. A corporation funding research for a fabric treatment that absorbs harmful rays from the sun is most likely to manufacture sunscreen.