"And it's not like my mother and father were born into wealth. It's not like they gambled away their family fortunes. My parents come from poor people who came from people who came from people people, all the way back to the very first poor people" (Alexie, 2007:11) according to the novel "The absolutely diary of a part time indian"

1. What's the above text saying in clear detail?
2. Based on what evidence?
3. How does it say it??

1. The above text is expressing that the author's parents did not come from a wealthy background and did not lose any family fortunes through gambling. Instead, they come from a long line of poor ancestors who have been in the same economic situation for generations.

2. The evidence for this statement is the author's assertion that their parents were not born into wealth and did not gamble away any family fortunes. The mention of their poor ancestry also suggests that there is a generational pattern of economic struggle.

3. The text communicates this information straightforwardly and with a hint of repetition for emphasis. The author states that their parents were not born into wealth, but rather came from poor people who, in turn, came from more poor people, tracing back to the very first poor people. This repetitive phrasing highlights the long-standing cycle of poverty in the author's family history.

1. The above text is saying that the narrator's parents did not inherit wealth or lose it through gambling. They come from a long line of poor people, tracing back to their ancestors who were also poor.

2. The evidence for this statement is that the narrator mentions that their parents were not born into wealth and did not squander any family fortunes. They come from families that have a history of poverty, going back to their earliest ancestors.

3. The text conveys this information through a straightforward and descriptive tone. It emphasizes the generational cycle of poverty by stating that the parents come from poor people who come from people who come from people, all the way back to the very first poor people. This repetitive phrasing highlights the enduring nature of poverty in the narrator's family history.