Which of the following best analyzes the impact of European trade on development of European cities number one global trade made it possible for new ideas and spread the cities helped ideas spread quickly number two European trade did not really impact the development of European cities because they did not get larger number three there was less trade in European cities because most of it was done between the Western and hemispheres of Asia and number four it became harder to trade in cities because rulers created more limitations to prevent foreign Goods
The best analysis of the impact of European trade on the development of European cities is option number one: "Global trade made it possible for new ideas and spread, and the cities helped ideas spread quickly."
European trade in the late medieval and early modern periods brought vast wealth to European cities, stimulating their growth and development. This trade introduced new goods, ideas, and technologies from different parts of the world, leading to increased cultural exchange and the spread of knowledge. Cities acted as hubs for trade networks, attracting merchants and creating economic opportunities. Additionally, trade routes and connections established by European traders contributed to the growth of urban centers. Thus, option number one accurately reflects the positive impact of European trade on the development of European cities.