Which of the following defines valid reasoning?(1 point)
Responses
reasoning that persuades the audience
reasoning that someone has used before
reasoning that reflects strong emotion
reasoning that is well-founded
reasoning that is well-founded
Which of the following describes a claim?(1 point)
Responses
a disappointing conversation
a statement that presents the opinion of the speaker
an idea that makes an argument well-founded
evidence that supports the speaker's opinion
a statement that presents the opinion of the speaker
Which of the following defines reasoning?(1 point)
Responses
the validity of an argument
the way an argument is planned out
the speaker's opinions
the strength of evidence in an argument
the way an argument is planned out
The correct answer is:
reasoning that is well-founded
To determine which option defines valid reasoning, let's analyze each response:
1. Reasoning that persuades the audience: While persuasive reasoning can be effective in influencing others, it does not necessarily mean that it is valid. Valid reasoning is based on logic, evidence, and sound argumentation, rather than simply swaying others' opinions.
2. Reasoning that someone has used before: Just because someone has used a particular line of reasoning before does not make it automatically valid. The validity of reasoning relies on its logical coherence, factual accuracy, and the strength of the evidence presented.
3. Reasoning that reflects strong emotion: Emotional reasoning tends to be subjective and biased. While strong emotions can sometimes be relevant in certain contexts, valid reasoning should primarily rely on logical explanations and objective evidence.
4. Reasoning that is well-founded: This option best defines valid reasoning. Valid reasoning is based on solid foundations, such as logical principles, objective evidence, and valid assumptions. It is grounded in logical coherence and the use of valid inference.
Therefore, the correct response to the question is: "reasoning that is well-founded".