is this conclusion clear and well written is there anything i need to improve on:The purpose of this research is to examine how vaccination coverage impacts the number of measles cases and the spread of diseases controlled by the Australian government's MMR vaccination program. To ensure the credibility of this report, a systematic review of research journals and websites was conducted to find a solution to the research question. After analyzing and interpreting three pieces of evidence related to vaccine coverage rate, number of measles cases, and herd immunity, it was discovered that an increase in MMR vaccine coverage has a significant effect on reducing the incidence rate of measles infection.
The conclusion is clear and well-written. It effectively summarizes the purpose of the research and the methodology used to reach the conclusion. However, there is room for improvement in terms of providing specific details or statistics to support the claim of a significant effect. Including specific numbers or percentages related to the reduction in measles cases after increasing MMR vaccine coverage would add more credibility to the conclusion.
Overall, the conclusion is clear and well written. It summarizes the purpose of the research, mentions the methodology used (systematic review of research journals and websites), and presents the main findings.
However, there are a few areas where improvement can be made:
1. Provide more specific details: Instead of just mentioning "three pieces of evidence," it would be beneficial to briefly outline the specific studies or data sources that were analyzed. This would add credibility to the conclusion.
2. Support the claim of "significant effect": While you mentioned that an increase in MMR vaccine coverage has a significant effect on reducing measles infection rates, it would be helpful to provide some supporting statistics or percentages to strengthen this claim further.
3. Consider adding recommendations: Since the purpose of the research is to examine the impact of vaccination coverage, it would be beneficial to include some recommendations based on the findings. These could be suggestions for policies or strategies to increase vaccine coverage rates and prevent outbreaks.
By addressing these suggestions, the conclusion can be further enhanced and provide a stronger ending to the research.