in this concept is informed consent vs dimished opportunity whiich fits better From the analysis of the legal arguments and the viewpoints of relevant stakeholders above, legal alternatives offer individuals the choice of defining the boundaries of the law, and seeking justice according to the Rule of Law. A major legal alternative, from the perspective of doctors, is the concept of Informed concept or diminished opportunity. The “Informed concept or diminished opportunity” argument is actually a legal concept that, a patient misses the possibility of better medical attention (Bird, n.d.). Moreover, this concept allows doctors to handle operations without the worry of being sued after the surgery (Tibballs, 2007). This is considered significant due to the fact that doctors can perform in their best condition without being interrupted, and are not obstructed by a low chance of success. “Information that a reasonable in the patient’s position would, make a reasonably informed decision to undergo the treatment” (Queensland Government, 2020). Nevertheless, there are additional requirements that must be met to prove a Informed concept or diminished opportunity due to negligence, including the probability of recovery or survival in the underlying case, as well as the presence of identified causes and a high level of medical certainty.
Based on the information provided, the concept of informed consent fits better in this context. Informed consent refers to the process where individuals are provided with all the relevant information about a medical procedure or treatment so that they can make an informed decision about whether or not to proceed. This legal concept ensures that patients have the ability to define the boundaries of the law by having the right to make choices about their own medical care. It also aligns with the notion of seeking justice according to the Rule of Law, as it upholds the principle of autonomy and respects individual rights. Conversely, the concept of diminished opportunity does not seem as applicable in this context, as it may imply a limitation on the patient's options or a potential decrease in the quality of medical attention.
Based on the given information, the concept that fits better in this case is the concept of "Informed consent." Informed consent refers to the process where a patient is provided with all necessary information about a medical treatment or procedure, including its risks, benefits, and alternatives, so they can make an informed decision about their healthcare.
The argument presented states that the concept of informed consent gives individuals the ability to define the boundaries of the law and seek justice according to the rule of law. It allows patients to understand the potential risks and benefits of a medical procedure and make an informed decision based on that information.
Additionally, it is mentioned that doctors can perform in their best condition without being sued after the surgery if informed consent is obtained. This suggests that doctors are protected from legal consequences if they have properly informed the patient and obtained their consent before the procedure.
Therefore, based on the analysis and viewpoints provided, the concept of informed consent is more relevant and appropriate in this context.