Login or Sign Up
Menu
Ask a New Question

Reword this.

His response to this: Names or it didn't happen. I'll have you know I never overlook harassment that I see, and your accusations really p s me off. If someones being harassed you message me personally RIGHT AWAY and I take care of that stuff. I'm not mad at you though, but at the idea that I'd ever knowingly let someone down.

In reply, he states that he requires names to believe the incident occurred. He wants to make it clear that he never ignores harassment and the accusations made anger him. If anyone is being harassed, they should immediately contact him and he will handle the situation. He emphasizes that he is not upset with the person he is speaking to, but rather with the notion that he would willingly fail to support someone.

In first person.

My response to this statement would be: I need names to believe that the incident actually took place. Please understand that I never disregard instances of harassment that come to my attention, and your accusations truly infuriate me. If anyone is facing harassment, I urge them to personally reach out to me immediately, and I will take immediate action to address the issue. I want to clarify that my frustration lies not with you, but with the thought that I would ever deliberately let someone down.

He reacted to the statement by saying that unless there are specific names involved, he doesn't believe it occurred. He emphasized that he never ignores harassment incidents he witnesses and is genuinely irritated by the allegations. If someone is being harassed, they should notify him directly and he will promptly address the situation. He clarifies that his frustration is not directed at the person who made the claim, but rather at the thought that he would willingly neglect someone in need.