provide a critical analysis with a maximum of 125 words that disagrees with the following observation : Many critics of romeo and juliet have insisted upon the view that this play is a tragedy of fate and that the beautiful lovers of venova are overwhelmed entirely by tragic forces moving outside of and about them provide clear evidence that supports that romeo and juliet are not blameless victims
It is misguided to argue that Romeo and Juliet are merely hapless pawns at the mercy of external tragic forces. The characters' rash decisions, impulsive actions, and disregard for the consequences of their behavior ultimately seal their fate. Romeo's willingness to kill Tybalt and Juliet's deception of her parents are indications of their flawed judgment and moral lapses. Furthermore, Romeo's infatuation with Rosaline and Juliet's betrothal to Paris are also choices that contribute to their tragic end. In other words, Romeo and Juliet are not entirely blameless for the events that lead to their death. While external factors may have played a role in their demise, their actions and decisions cannot be absolved of responsibility.
While some critics argue that Romeo and Juliet are blameless victims caught in the tragic forces of fate, there is evidence to suggest otherwise. Shakespeare purposely portrays the young lovers as impulsive and reckless, making choices that contribute to their tragic end. Their hasty decision to marry without considering the consequences, Romeo's killing of Tybalt, and Juliet's decision to fake her death all show their agency in shaping their own destiny. Furthermore, their families' ongoing feud provides a backdrop of conflict that influences their actions. Romeo's infatuation with Rosaline and Juliet's naivety also contribute to their downfalls. By showcasing the characters' flaws and active involvement in their own fate, Shakespeare undermines any notion that they are solely victims of external forces.
