If the Supreme Court heard a case about African Americans being denied the right to vote, what would the justices use to determine if the discrimination was justified?
Responses
the strict scrutiny test
the strict scrutiny test
the rational bias test
the rational bias test
the litmus test
the litmus test
the Lemon test
the strict scrutiny test
In this scenario, the Supreme Court would likely use the strict scrutiny test to determine if the discrimination against African Americans in denying them the right to vote is justified. The strict scrutiny test is a rigorous standard used by the court to evaluate the constitutionality of laws or policies that potentially infringe upon fundamental rights, such as the right to vote. Under this test, the burden would be on the government to show that the discriminatory practice is necessary to achieve a compelling government interest and that there are no less restrictive alternatives available.
The rational basis test, on the other hand, is a lower standard of review primarily applied to evaluate laws that do not involve fundamental rights or suspect classifications. The litmus test and the Lemon test are not directly applicable to this context. The litmus test is a generic term used to denote a single criterion or factor used to evaluate someone or something, while the Lemon test is a legal test used to analyze disputes involving the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment regarding government actions or policies related to religion.