Which of the following defines valid reasoning?(1 point)
Responses
reasoning that reflects strong emotion
reasoning that reflects strong emotion
reasoning that is well-founded
reasoning that is well-founded
reasoning that persuades the audience
reasoning that persuades the audience
reasoning that someone has used before
reasoning that is well-founded.
Which of the following describes a claim?(1 point)
Responses
an idea that makes an argument well-founded
an idea that makes an argument well-founded
a statement that presents the opinion of the speaker
a statement that presents the opinion of the speaker
evidence that supports the speaker's opinion
evidence that supports the speaker's opinion
a disappointing conversation
a statement that presents the opinion of the speaker.
Which of the following defines reasoning?(1 point)
Responses
the way an argument is planned out
the way an argument is planned out
the speaker's opinions
the speaker's opinions
the validity of an argument
the validity of an argument
the strength of evidence in an argument
the strength of evidence in an argument
the way an argument is planned out.
The correct definition of valid reasoning is reasoning that is well-founded. This means that the reasoning is based on solid evidence, logic, and facts.
The correct answer is "reasoning that is well-founded."
To determine the correct response, we need to understand what valid reasoning means. Valid reasoning refers to the process of drawing logical conclusions based on supported evidence or sound principles. It involves making logical connections between premises and coming to a justifiable conclusion.
By considering the provided responses, we can eliminate the options that do not align with the definition of valid reasoning.
The first response, "reasoning that reflects strong emotion," does not necessarily guarantee that the reasoning is well-founded or logical. Emotions can heavily influence reasoning, but they do not guarantee its validity.
The third response, "reasoning that persuades the audience," does not focus on the logical soundness of the reasoning. While persuasive reasoning can be compelling, it does not automatically make it valid.
The last response, "reasoning that someone has used before," does not provide any information about the logical foundation or soundness of the reasoning. Just because someone has used a particular line of reasoning before does not make it valid or well-founded.
Therefore, the correct response is the second option, "reasoning that is well-founded," as it aligns with the definition of valid reasoning by indicating a logical and well-supported process.