Which factor most complicated efforts to establish a stable Iraqi government in 2005

The factor that most complicated efforts to establish a stable Iraqi government in 2005 was sectarian divisions and violence. The country was deeply divided along ethnic and religious lines, with the Shia majority and Sunni minority engaged in a bitter power struggle. This led to a surge in sectarian violence, with sectarian militias and terrorist groups carrying out bombings, assassinations, and other attacks on civilians and government officials. The violence made it difficult to establish a functioning government, as officials were targeted by militants and many citizens feared for their lives. In addition, the presence of US troops and their role in the political process was also a complicating factor.

What difficulties did the US experience in the war on terror

The US experienced several difficulties in the war on terror, including:

1. Insurgencies and guerrilla warfare: Terrorist groups and insurgents in Iraq, Afghanistan, and other countries used guerrilla tactics, such as roadside bombings and suicide attacks, to disrupt US efforts to establish stable governments and security.

2. Public opposition: Large numbers of people in both the US and around the world opposed the war on terror, with many arguing that it was causing more harm than good, and that the US was violating human rights and international law.

3. Difficulty in identifying and locating terrorists: Terrorist organizations operated in secretive ways, making them difficult to identify and locate.

4. Coordination between agencies: The war on terror involved multiple government agencies with overlapping missions and objectives, creating difficulties in coordination and communication.

5. Legal issues and treatment of detainees: The legality of detaining individuals without trial, as had occurred in Guantanamo Bay, and the use of torture and other harsh interrogation techniques were controversial and raised concerns about the US's adherence to international law and human rights.

6. Cost: The cost of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan was enormous, totaling trillions of dollars, which put immense strain on the US economy and social programs.

Why did protests start with the Arab spring

The protests of the Arab Spring were sparked by a range of factors, including political repression, economic hardship, corruption, and lack of freedom and human rights. For decades, authoritarian regimes in the Middle East had used repression and violence to stay in power, while inequality and poverty were commonplace. In addition, the rise of social media and other communication technologies made it easier for people to connect and organize protests and other forms of dissent, giving people a platform to voice their frustrations and demand change. The spark for the Arab Spring was the self-immolation of a Tunisian street vendor in December 2010, which led to protests against the government and eventually to the flight of the Tunisian president, inspiring similar uprisings across the region. The protests were not limited to one country or group, but instead represented a broad grassroots movement for democracy, human rights, and a more equal distribution of wealth.

What contributed to the 2008 financial crisis

There were several factors that contributed to the 2008 financial crisis, including:

1. Housing market bubble: A housing market bubble had developed in the United States where housing prices rose rapidly and housing supply could not keep pace. This led to an increase in the number of mortgages given out, including to subprime borrowers who would not have qualified for a mortgage under normal circumstances.

2. Risky lending practices: Many mortgage lenders engaged in risky lending practices, such as lending to borrowers without requiring proof of income and offering adjustable-rate mortgages with low “teaser” interest rates that later adjusted higher, making it difficult for borrowers to keep up with payments.

3. Securitization of mortgages: Banks and other financial institutions bundled mortgages together and sold them as securities to investors. These securities were complex and often difficult to understand, making it difficult to assess their value.

4. Over-leveraging and excessive risk-taking: Financial institutions made large investments and took on significant leverage to increase profitability, often using borrowed funds to amplify their returns. This created a situation where even small losses could significantly damage their financial health.

5. Lack of regulation: Weak regulatory oversight allowed financial institutions to engage in risky practices without adequate safeguards or oversight.

The combination of these factors led to a collapse in the housing market and a wave of mortgage defaults, which in turn caused widespread financial instability and triggered a global economic recession.

What was the main purpose of WTO

The main purpose of the World Trade Organization (WTO) is to promote free and fair trade among its member countries. The WTO was established in 1995 to replace the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and is a global organization with 164 member countries. The WTO works to create an environment where goods and services can move freely across borders and where trade is conducted in a fair and predictable way. It does this by setting rules and negotiating agreements on a range of trade-related issues, such as tariffs, subsidies, intellectual property rights, and dispute settlement mechanisms. The WTO also provides a forum for member countries to discuss and negotiate trade issues and to address issues that may affect trade, such as food safety and environmental protection. The ultimate goal of the WTO is to promote economic growth and development by expanding international trade and creating opportunities for businesses and consumers around the world.

What concerns developed with introduction of the internet

With the introduction of the internet, several concerns have developed, including:

1. Privacy: The internet has made it easier for companies and governments to collect personal data, raising concerns about privacy and how that data is being used.

2. Cybercrime: The internet has created new opportunities for criminals to engage in fraud, theft, and other illegal activities.

3. Cyberbullying: The anonymity and the ease of communication on the internet have led to an increase in cyber-bullying and harassment.

4. Disinformation and fake news: The internet has made it easier for people to spread false information, which can spread rapidly and have real-world consequences.

5. Addiction: The internet has created new forms of addiction, such as social media addiction and internet gaming disorder.

6. Digital divide: The unequal distribution of access to the internet has led to a digital divide, creating disparities in education, employment, and access to services between those with internet access and those without.

7. Filter bubbles: The internet has led to the creation of filter bubbles, where people are only exposed to information that confirms their existing beliefs, leading to polarization and a lack of exposure to diverse perspectives.

Overall, while the internet has brought tremendous benefits, it also raises important ethical, social, and political concerns that need to be addressed.

2003 Supreme Court decision that allowed an applicants race

The 2003 Supreme Court decision that allowed an applicant's race to be considered as a factor in college admissions was the case of Grutter v. Bollinger. In this case, the University of Michigan Law School had been sued by Barbara Grutter, a white woman who was denied admission to the school despite having higher test scores and grades than some minority students who were admitted. The University of Michigan Law School argued that it considered an applicant's race as one of many factors in its admissions process in order to achieve diversity in its student body. The Supreme Court ultimately ruled (5-4) in favor of the University of Michigan Law School, stating that considering an applicant's race as a factor in college admissions was permissible as long as it was part of a holistic review of the applicant's file and not the sole determining factor. The Court held that achieving diversity in higher education was a compelling state interest that could justify the consideration of race. This decision upheld affirmative action policies that allow schools to use race as a factor in admissions to promote diversity.