In which case did the Supreme Court rule that police must inform criminal suspects of their legal rights upon their arrest?
A.
Marbury v. Madison
B.
Miranda v. Arizona
C.
State of California v. O. J. Simpson
D.
Brown v. Board of Education
B. Miranda v. Arizona
What is government attempting to protect with civil rights laws?
A.
the environment
B.
the rights of minorities
C.
the US economy and consumers
D.
national security
B. The rights of minorities.
The case in which the Supreme Court ruled that police must inform criminal suspects of their legal rights upon their arrest is B. Miranda v. Arizona.
To verify this answer, you can review the details and outcome of each of the mentioned cases. Here's how you can approach it:
1. Start by understanding the concept of Miranda rights, which include the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. These rights are a result of the Supreme Court ruling in Miranda v. Arizona.
2. Look into the other cases mentioned - Marbury v. Madison, State of California v. O. J. Simpson, and Brown v. Board of Education.
3. Marbury v. Madison is a landmark case but it does not pertain to the issue of informing criminal suspects of their rights. It established the principle of judicial review.
4. State of California v. O. J. Simpson is a criminal trial involving a celebrity, but it does not focus on the issue of informing suspects of their rights.
5. Brown v. Board of Education is a significant case in the civil rights movement, but it does not deal with criminal suspects' rights.
By considering the details of each case, it becomes evident that the correct answer is Miranda v. Arizona.