What 2 resources brought people to Spokane?
1. The Spokane River and its surrounding natural resources, such as timber and minerals, brought early settlers and industry to the area.
2. The development of railroads in the late 1800s and early 1900s also brought people to Spokane as a transportation hub and center of commerce in the Inland Northwest.
Why did Washington Territory attract so many immigrants from Scandinavian countries?
Washington Territory attracted many immigrants from Scandinavian countries because of several factors.
Firstly, the region's climate and terrain were similar to those of the Scandinavian countries, so the immigrants felt comfortable and could continue their traditional agricultural practices.
Secondly, the prospect of homesteading opportunities and land ownership in Washington Territory was very appealing to many Scandinavians, who had limited opportunities for land ownership in their home countries.
Thirdly, the presence of established Scandinavian communities in Washington Territory, such as the town of Ballard in Seattle, provided a sense of familiarity and support for new immigrants.
Finally, the opportunity to work in industries such as fishing, logging, and mining in the Pacific Northwest, where labor was in high demand, also attracted many Scandinavian immigrants who were skilled in these trades.
All these factors combined to make Washington Territory a desirable destination for Scandinavian immigrants seeking a better life and new opportunities.
How does the power of the executive branch affect the power of the legislative branch?
*
The governor signs or vetoes bills passed by the legislature.
The treasurer carries out and amends the state budget.
The lieutenant governor appoints and oversees the state senate.
The attorney general defends or repeals state laws in court
The power of the executive branch can significantly affect the power of the legislative branch in a few ways:
1. The governor's ability to sign or veto bills passed by the legislature gives them significant influence over the legislative process. If the governor vetoes a bill, the legislature can still override the veto with a supermajority, but this requires significant agreement and support from lawmakers.
2. The treasurer's power to carry out and amend the state budget can also impact the legislative branch's ability to allocate funds as they see fit. If the treasurer amends the budget or uses their power to shift funds to different programs or initiatives, this can impact the goals and priorities set by the legislative branch.
3. The lieutenant governor's role as the overseer of the state senate can affect the legislative branch's ability to pass bills and conduct business. If the lieutenant governor is not supportive of the legislative branch's priorities or has a different political agenda, they can use their power to limit the effectiveness of the legislature.
4. The attorney general's role in defending or repealing state laws in court can also affect the legislative branch's power. If the attorney general is not supportive of a particular law or policy passed by the legislature, they can bring legal challenges that can result in the law being struck down or modified. This can limit the legislative branch's ability to enact policies and laws they believe are necessary.
How does the power of the executive branch affect the power of the legislative branch?
a The governor signs or vetoes bills passed by the legislature.
b The treasurer carries out and amends the state budget.
c The lieutenant governor appoints and oversees the state senate.
d The attorney general defends or repeals state laws in court
i think a
Yes, a is correct. The power of the executive branch to sign or veto bills passed by the legislature can significantly affect the power of the legislative branch. The governor has the power to veto bills, which can limit the effectiveness of the legislative branch if the governor does not support their policies or priorities. If the governor signs a bill, it becomes law and the legislative branch's agenda can move forward. Therefore, the governor plays a crucial role in the legislative process and has a significant influence over the power of the legislative branch.
Why did Washington’s first bid for statehood fail?
Washington's first bid for statehood in 1853 failed due to several reasons:
1. Lack of population: At the time, Washington's population was less than 5,000, which was below the minimum threshold required for statehood.
2. Political divisions: Political divisions within the territory, particularly between the eastern and western regions, hindered the statehood process. The eastern region had a different economy, culture, and political outlook from the western region, leading to disagreements over issues like tax policy, representation, and internal improvements.
3. Opposition from Oregon: At the time, Washington was part of the larger Oregon Territory. Residents of Oregon opposed Washington's bid for statehood because they believed it would disrupt the balance of power within the territory and because they wanted to maintain control over the region's resources.
4. National political issues: In 1853, the United States was facing several national political issues, including the Compromise of 1850 and the debate over slavery in the territories. These debates took priority over Washington's bid for statehood, and the federal government was not focused on adding new states to the Union.
Overall, a combination of factors, including Washington's small population, internal divisions, and external opposition, prevented the territory from achieving statehood in 1853.