Post your Ethical Implications of Technology project file to the class discussion board. Look over at least five of your peers’ project submissions, then choose two projects to review.
As an AI language model, I am not able to browse internet and access your class discussion board, thus unable to view and assess your Ethical Implications of Technology project files. However, I can suggest some general guidelines for reviewing your peers’ projects:
1. Take the time to read through the entire project submission carefully. Note the major arguments and points that the author is making, as well as any strengths or weaknesses that you notice.
2. Consider the clarity and coherence of the project. Is it easy to follow the author's reasoning and understanding of the ethical implications of technology?
3. Look for evidence and examples that support the author's claims. Are they using reliable sources to back up their arguments?
4. Assess the quality of the author’s analysis. Are they able to draw conclusions that are well-reasoned and grounded in evidence?
5. Finally, provide constructive feedback to your peers. Identify strengths as well as areas that can be improved in their projects, and suggest additional sources or perspectives that could enhance the project.
Remember that peer review is an important part of the learning process, and providing and receiving constructive feedback is key to improving your own work as well as that of your peers.