Effects of the 7 Years War read p88, 89 and 94 and write about the different points of view you hear in Fig 3.19, 3.20 and 3.22
Fig 3.19 presents the perspective of British statesman William Pitt, who saw the 7 Years War as a victory for Great Britain. He believed that the war had secured British dominance in North America and India, and established Britain as a global power. Pitt also saw the war as a way to preserve the balance of power in Europe and prevent the rise of any one nation as a dominant force.
Fig 3.20 presents the perspective of Native American leader Pontiac, who saw the 7 Years War as a catastrophic event for Native people. He believed that the war had brought destruction and displacement to Indigenous communities, and had strengthened the grip of European colonial powers on Native lands. Pontiac viewed the war as a clear example of European imperialism and the exploitation of Indigenous peoples.
Fig 3.22 presents the perspective of French philosopher Voltaire, who saw the 7 Years War as a pointless and devastating conflict. He believed that the war had been fueled by the greed and ambitions of European rulers, and had brought suffering and misery to countless people. Voltaire saw the war as a failure of diplomacy and a sign of the irrationality and barbarism of European politics.
In summary, the three figures in the book have different views on the effects of the 7 Years War. While Pitt saw the war as a victory for Britain and a way to maintain the balance of power, Pontiac viewed it as a disaster for Native people and a continuation of colonial oppression. Voltaire saw the war as a senseless and destructive conflict rooted in irrational ambitions and nationalism. These different perspectives highlight the complex and multifaceted nature of historical events, and the impact they have on different groups and individuals.